View Single Post
  #66 (permalink)  
Old 08-31-2008, 12:05 PM
cobra de capell cobra de capell is offline
Banned
Visit my Photo Gallery

 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Middle Of Nowhere, USA
Cobra Make, Engine: ERA 428 FE 4-speed CR "TL" heavy spline
Posts: 3,907
Not Ranked     
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Scott S View Post
I have served 3 terms as a small (2000 pop) mayor, beside raising kids it was the single largest learning experience of my life.

I was always amazed at how wimpy other politicians were in making decisions.

Scott S
Well, WOOHOO! to you for geting involved at the mayor level - it's a thankless task most of the time, depending on politics in the area. Apparently Palin likes to get things done, make decisioins - as I imagine you did as mayor.

By the way, with your background you have an excellent view of how voting 'present', in the case of Obama in the Illinois Legislature impacts getting things done and taking a firm stand on important issues.

From Real Clear Politics:

"While some conservatives and Republicans surely will harp on what they call his "liberal record," highlighting applicable votes to support their case, it's Obama's history of voting "present" in Springfield - even on some of the most controversial and politically explosive issues of the day - that raises questions that he will need to answer. Voting "present" is one of three options in the Illinois Legislature (along with "yes" and "no"), but it's almost never an option for the occupant of the Oval Office.

We aren't talking about a "present" vote on whether to name a state office building after a deceased state official, but rather about votes that reflect an officeholder's core values.

For example, in 1997, Obama voted "present" on two bills (HB 382 and SB 230) that would have prohibited a procedure often referred to as partial birth abortion. He also voted "present" on SB 71, which lowered the first offense of carrying a concealed weapon from a felony to a misdemeanor and raised the penalty of subsequent offenses.

In 1999, Obama voted "present" on SB 759, a bill that required mandatory adult prosecution for firing a gun on or near school grounds. The bill passed the state Senate 52-1. Also in 1999, Obama voted "present" on HB 854 that protected the privacy of sex-abuse victims by allowing petitions to have the trial records sealed. He was the only member to not support the bill.

In 2001, Obama voted "present" on two parental notification abortion bills (HB 1900 and SB 562), and he voted "present" on a series of bills (SB 1093, 1094, 1095) that sought to protect a child if it survived a failed abortion. In his book, the Audacity of Hope, on page 132, Obama explained his problems with the "born alive" bills, specifically arguing that they would overturn Roe v. Wade. But he failed to mention that he only felt strongly enough to vote "present" on the bills instead of "no."

And finally in 2001, Obama voted "present" on SB 609, a bill prohibiting strip clubs and other adult establishments from being within 1,000 feet of schools, churches, and daycares.

If Obama had taken a position for or against these bills, he would have pleased some constituents and alienated others. Instead, the Illinois legislator-turned-U.S. senator and, now, Democratic presidential hopeful essentially took a pass.

Because it takes affirmative votes to pass legislation in the Illinois Senate, a "present" vote is tantamount to a "no" vote. A "present" vote is generally used to provide political cover for legislators who don't want to be on the record against a bill that they oppose. Of course, Obama isn't the first or only Illinois state senator to vote "present," but he is the only one running for President of the United States.

He will need to explain those "present" votes as a member of the Illinois Legislature if he hopes to become America's commander-in-chief."
_____

So, when BO came up with "above my pay grade" responding to a question relating to when life begins - it was more of the "present" approach to issues - what would he do as POTUS?