View Single Post
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 09-29-2008, 10:16 PM
Tom Kirkham Tom Kirkham is offline
CC Member / Sponsor
Visit my Photo Gallery

 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Provo, UT
Cobra Make, Engine: Daytona Coupe
Posts: 1,359
Not Ranked     
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dcmgt View Post
I have copies of all the original computer analysis Bob Negstadt and the other guy at Ford did to design the Cobra suspension and they did a follow-on analysis after the car was built to determine how the suspension/steering should be optimized for racing. The main finding.......move the inner tie rod ends further inboard.
Wow. I am amazed that the reports are still around. Did you get them from BC? Do your reports have the first chassis that Negstadt designed or the latter chassis that Turner and Remington designed?

I came to the same conclusion. If you look on the KMP259 thread you will see that Morris changed his rack, for this very reason. Shortening a stock rack is not too bad on a lathe. It does however increase the minimum turning radius.

Also I believe that some of BC success in tuning his suspension came from following Colin Chapman's theory of "Any suspension will work, so long as you don't let it."

From what Peter Brock has told me I am sure that AC had a ton of steering racks left over from the 289 Cobras, and so the 427 Cobra was stuck with a non optimized rack. Actually it is amazing that Turner and Remington were able to make it work as well as they did...
__________________
Evolve Lubricants
https://evolvelube.com/
Cubic Performance

Last edited by Tom Kirkham; 09-29-2008 at 10:22 PM..
Reply With Quote