[turnpike boy]

For some reason, Steve, I cannot get the picture of whatever it was that you posted. Not a big deal; I have a good imagination and can probably guess the nature of what it is.

As to out of context, it's a hair difficult to take something said "out of context" when you watch the question asked and the immediate response to same. If the question wasn't understood by the responder, that hardly makes observations from here out of context. As you clearly ASSumed that I hadn't had that opportunity (and it wasn't from cDc's post - I can't get that either), the attempt to inveigh ignorance is laughable.

On the other hand, since you apparently are quick to judge and seemingly blind to difficult truths, it doesn't surprise me that you find whatever vacuous reasons to support your perspectives. Arguments are just that - discussions, on the other hand, attempt to find fact amid the noise. Plugging one's ears because of the noise doesn't make what does get heard, fact.

There is no interest from here in making any effort to explain or justify what has been said. It is a matter of record, straight from Obama's lips. The question was unambiguous and direct - as was his reply. The principal difference between the two candidates is that one wants changes to coal policies, and the other will mandate them at all cost.

Have a great day. Have you voted yet?


-Roger