View Single Post
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 11-13-2001, 04:30 PM
fatman fatman is offline
CC Member
Visit my Photo Gallery

 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Union, KY USA,
Posts: 7
Send a message via ICQ to fatman
Not Ranked     
Default Thorn , Bill

What you both have said seems to make more sense the more times I read it I guese what I was trying to prove is that I am not a liar ,after my original post I was called that and worse.The case was set for trial 11-13-2001 it was continued ,in part because Classic Roadster's atty. stated in his motion that "negotiations have broken down".There have never been even any overtures of settlement talks to me or my atty. Therefore his statement is not true,the statement is an unmitigated lie.If you or I said that to a court we would be in serious trouble.It is typical of the way this suit has been handled by the defendants and their atty's.I'll send you a video if you want me to. Thanks for your input