View Single Post
  #91 (permalink)  
Old 06-02-2009, 09:32 PM
Ibr8k4vetts's Avatar
Ibr8k4vetts Ibr8k4vetts is offline
Senior Club Cobra Member
Visit my Photo Gallery

 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Santa Barbara, Ca., ca
Cobra Make, Engine: R.U.C.C. with a 427FE, toploader
Posts: 1,435
Not Ranked     
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jwd View Post
They are not. Can you show me any law/regulation that says so? I highly doubt it.

Jim
http://www.dmv.ca.gov/pubs/vctop/d12/vc27315.htm

(g) This section does not apply to a passenger or operator with a physically disabling condition or medical condition ( )10 that would prevent appropriate restraint in a safety belt, if the condition is duly certified by a licensed physician and surgeon or by a licensed chiropractor who shall state the nature of the condition, as well as the reason the restraint is inappropriate. This section also does not apply to a public employee, when in an authorized emergency vehicle as defined in paragraph (1) of subdivision (b) of Section 165, or to ( )1 a passenger in ( )1 a seat behind the front seat of an authorized emergency vehicle as defined in paragraph (1) of subdivision (b) of Section 165 operated by the public employee, unless required by the agency employing the public employee.
__________________
Mike Z
Nothing sucks more than that moment during an argument when you realize you’re wrong.
Reply With Quote