So now that the speech has been made public do we have anyone that still thinks it is a bad idea? Personally, I think it could have been better written, and maybe a bit more inspirational, but then I'm one of those elitist prigs who is just never satisfied with 'good enough'.
Oh, and for those of you who are convinced that the speech was changed please feel free to prove it. Jim Greer of the GOP in FL has also been squawking about how the speech was supposed to contain all kinds of political rhetoric, but it looks like he was making the whole thing up as he has no evidence to back up his statements. Please feel free to help him out 'cause it doesn't look good when conservative types make baseless accusations.
Steve