Thread: ESC mandatory
View Single Post
  #29 (permalink)  
Old 09-19-2009, 05:19 AM
Rebel1 Rebel1 is offline
CC Member
Visit my Photo Gallery

 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Brisbane Australia, QLD
Cobra Make, Engine: RMC under re-construction, GenIV with tremec 600, Jag 3.31 L/S diff
Posts: 3,318
Not Ranked     
Default

Baz, you are merely reinforcing my comments. John Staszynski was representing the Australian Cobra collective, not just the SA chapter.

His want was to try and have the cobra not classed as
an ordinary ICV wherein one is exposed to ADR changes but to have some classification not unlike the Hot Rod association, set the standards as to the build/engines/etc and have them approved and fixed and then have the Cobra Clubs "manage" the build standards.

Have a look at this paragraph from the hot rod site:
The Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) is a sub-committee of each State Council and will have the responsibility of:Liason between the State Registration Authorities and the ASRF.
Establishing and maintaining acceptable building standards for ASRF class vehicles with the objective of ensuring that these vehicles may be registered.


To amuse yourself even further go here http://www.infrastructure.gov.au/roa...treet_rod.aspx
and look at the Street Rod Manual and then tell me why a cobra builder has so many restrictions whilst a hot rod builder has so many exemptions.


If the Australian Street Rod Federation can pull it off why can't the Cobra Clubs?.


I'll tell you why ... because the Street Rod Federation had the future of the movement in mind and got off their collective backsides and did the work.


Thats what John Staszynski was attempting. Sadly, he was a sole voice.
__________________
It's impossible to soar like an eagle when you're surrounded by turkeys.

Last edited by Rebel1; 09-19-2009 at 05:22 AM..
Reply With Quote