View Single Post
  #101 (permalink)  
Old 10-09-2009, 07:22 AM
392cobra's Avatar
392cobra 392cobra is offline
6th Generation Texan
Visit my Photo Gallery

 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Devil's Backbone,RR 32, TX
Cobra Make, Engine: Lone Star Classics #240,Candy Apple Red,Keith Craft 418w - 602 HP,584 TQ
Posts: 8,157
Not Ranked     
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jamo View Post
Well...Pakistan already has the bomb.

Taliban is a different creature than al-Queda...like diarrhea and constipation. They both gotta go.

New White House spin: Taliban not really an enemy, has role in Afghanistan’s Future

No foolin’.They’re looking for any way they can to avoid giving McChrystal the troops he says he needs to secure the country, so they’ve come up with a way out. If the people we’ve been fighting for eight years aren’t the enemy, then the country no longer needs to be secured from them, does it?
In other words, rather than eat crap by forthrightly admitting he’s prepared to abandon huge swaths of the country to Islamist fascists rather than invest another 40,000 troops, he’s going to create an artificial distinction between the Taliban and Al Qaeda to let him save face by claiming he’s focused on “the real enemy.” Much like how he was focused during the campaign on “the good war” in Afghanistan rather than “the bad war” in Iraq. I wonder how long it’ll be before he decides that not everyone who’s in Al Qaeda is an enemy either — or, better yet, that AQ’s been “substantially defeated” or something, which has been the unstated thrust of all those WH-leaked pieces in the press lately about how weak Bin Laden’s gang has become. Why, I’ll bet in a year or so we’ll be told that they’re so weak that we can start pulling out of Afghanistan altogether. Things sure have improved over there since Bush was president, huh?

http://hotair.com/archives/2009/10/0...istans-future/

Last edited by 392cobra; 10-09-2009 at 07:32 AM..
Reply With Quote