More Truth (not really) in Advertising - Page 2

kevinR · #21 (**permalink**) 08-13-2003, 10:02 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by mrmustang

I believe that the original ad was indeed forwarded to SAAC at at time................

Bill S.

interesting. not that i get everything, but i've been the one at saac for these cars (and 7000, 8000's) since 1997. i have an email to hq to check.

Bill Wells · #22 (**permalink**) 08-14-2003, 04:13 AM

kevin r, i know the original adv from 2001 was sent to SAI, see my 12-30-01 post on page one of this thread . the original listing long ago did NOT say it was a classic roadster, the second listing at least added that much to the adv but it was kinda buried in the text , back in 2001when it sold , allegedly, for $36.5k. so , i gotta believe someone in the SAI or SAAC world saw it back then...since the CS vs FFR/SPF suit was still hot and heavy baack then, i would think sai would have retained the adv as yet another 'cause' for their legal claims/ position...bill

mrmustang · #23 (**permalink**) 08-14-2003, 05:05 AM

Check with Vinny L. as I may have copied him on this as well...........

Bill S.

Quote:

Originally posted by kevinR

interesting. not that i get everything, but i've been the one at saac for these cars (and 7000, 8000's) since 1997. i have an email to hq to check.

kevinR · #24 (**permalink**) 08-14-2003, 07:32 AM

thnaks guys