Main Menu
|
Nevada Classics
|
Advertise at CC
|
S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
23 |
24 |
25 |
26 |
27 |
28 |
29 |
30 |
31 |
|
|
|
|
|
CC Advertisers
|
|
1Likes
09-22-2016, 01:32 PM
|
|
CC Member/Contributor
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Greenville,
SC
Cobra Make, Engine: 70 Shelby convertible, ERA-289 FIA, 65 Sunbeam Tiger, mystery Ford powered 2dr convertible
Posts: 12,703
|
|
Not Ranked
Quote:
Originally Posted by feadam
Were the Naf's close to original shape and wheel base.
|
Who told you it was a NAF, as no NAF (including the one I owned many years ago) looked like that one.
Yours
One similar to mine (but still a documented NAF)
Quote:
Originally Posted by feadam
Were NAF's taken off original car shape?
|
No, the NAF was not a "splashed" body off of any original Cobra.
Bill S.
__________________
Instead of being part of the problem, be part of a successful solution.
First time Cobra buyers-READ THIS
|
09-22-2016, 05:48 PM
|
|
CC Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: St. Lucia, West Indies,
WI
Cobra Make, Engine: Unique 427SC 383 stroker
Posts: 3,767
|
|
Not Ranked
That body does not have an extended wheelbase. It looks that way because its sitting low over the prop wheels. I superimposed it over the pic Bill posted and accounting for slight variations of angle and focal length between the two images, the lines and features are practically identical. I would say its definitely a NAF or one of the variations thereof.
__________________
Tropical Buzz
Grant me the serenity to accept the things I cannot change, the strength to change the things I can, and the wisdom to know the difference. -(wasn't me)
BEWARE OF THE DOGma!! Dogmatism bites...
|
09-22-2016, 06:44 PM
|
|
CC Member/Contributor
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Greenville,
SC
Cobra Make, Engine: 70 Shelby convertible, ERA-289 FIA, 65 Sunbeam Tiger, mystery Ford powered 2dr convertible
Posts: 12,703
|
|
Not Ranked
Quote:
Originally Posted by Buzz
That body does not have an extended wheelbase. It looks that way because its sitting low over the prop wheels. I superimposed it over the pic Bill posted and accounting for slight variations of angle and focal length between the two images, the lines and features are practically identical. I would say its definitely a NAF or one of the variations thereof.
|
Try doing it with just the wheel arches as a guide, and you'll see the major differences and why I will stand behind my "it's not a NAF" statement above
__________________
Instead of being part of the problem, be part of a successful solution.
First time Cobra buyers-READ THIS
|
09-23-2016, 05:26 AM
|
|
CC Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: St. Lucia, West Indies,
WI
Cobra Make, Engine: Unique 427SC 383 stroker
Posts: 3,767
|
|
Not Ranked
I did. I created an exact trace of all of the lines and openings and superimposed it over your picture. In particular, the fender lines and wheel openings are an exact match. Once the body is lifted of the tucked up prop wheels the impression of it being a stretched wheelbase car is dramatically eliminated. I did this out of curiosity and have no stake in the outcome or what anyone chooses to believe.
__________________
Tropical Buzz
Grant me the serenity to accept the things I cannot change, the strength to change the things I can, and the wisdom to know the difference. -(wasn't me)
BEWARE OF THE DOGma!! Dogmatism bites...
|
09-23-2016, 08:23 AM
|
|
CC Member/Contributor
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Greenville,
SC
Cobra Make, Engine: 70 Shelby convertible, ERA-289 FIA, 65 Sunbeam Tiger, mystery Ford powered 2dr convertible
Posts: 12,703
|
|
Not Ranked
Quote:
Originally Posted by Buzz
I did. I created an exact trace of all of the lines and openings and superimposed it over your picture. In particular, the fender lines and wheel openings are an exact match. Once the body is lifted of the tucked up prop wheels the impression of it being a stretched wheelbase car is dramatically eliminated. I did this out of curiosity and have no stake in the outcome or what anyone chooses to believe.
|
I don't have a stake in it either, but did similar to you with a overlay in photoshop, and can see the differences both in the front and rear wheel arches and openings, along with the side grille opening. Top of the fenders don't quite match up either, whether I size up, or down, or stretch and shrink with both images to fit each other. I've tried it on three other known NAF's, as a side view, front nose, and tail shot. The nose is close (still off on openings), the tail does not come even close, even taking into account mounted and unmounted bodies. Just don't want someone to stumble across the thread in another 15 years from now and take it as fact that it was a NAF body when it is clearly not.
Bill S
__________________
Instead of being part of the problem, be part of a successful solution.
First time Cobra buyers-READ THIS
|
09-23-2016, 09:30 AM
|
|
CC Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Mesa,
AZ
Cobra Make, Engine: ERA #2119 289FIA
Posts: 5,380
|
|
Not Ranked
Jack and his body shop Mgr Carl, both told me an original was used. Don't remember what number. They were very heavy glass.
BTW, I have two foot boxes that I didn't use and two door inner panels. Make me an offer I can't refuse.
__________________
Karlos
"In the Land of the Pigs, The Butcher is King"
|
09-23-2016, 01:49 PM
|
CC Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Colorado Springs,
Co
Cobra Make, Engine: Cobra FF5/BBM 482
Posts: 155
|
|
Not Ranked
Thanks Buzz, Looked at as many pictures as I could find of NAF cobras and it looked close to me. Many of the NAF pictures have little differances so wasn't sure. From what guy that had body told me he is sure it was NAF, but he doesn't know much about cobras, he just bought mold with body and sold body (not to me). I haven't seen many NAF's so wasn't sure if they are close to original.
|
09-23-2016, 02:11 PM
|
|
CC Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: No city...only 118 residents in Manter,
KS
Cobra Make, Engine: Cobra Auto Works body, Ron Godell Racecars chassis, 1989 Mustang GT 5.0 HO (converted to carb), W/C T-5, 3.73's in a Ford 9" Traction-Loc.
Posts: 812
|
|
Not Ranked
A race-car isn't a bad idea, IMHO!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Antny
Build a racer using that body. Why cut it up as "wall art"?
|
Just curious...to whom would we refer the OP if he wanted someone to build a frame for just that purpose...I know there is Mr. Bruce, but aren't there other sources for chassis without the bodies (no disrespect for Mr. Bruce intended, I'm just curious about other sources, too)?
In the past various companies would sell chassis plans...the Kelmark GT (a "Dino replica"...sort of... ) comes to mind, which was originally designed to fit a shortened VW floorpan, but when built with the "Olds Toronado" powertrain required a purpose built frame...Kelmark sold plans for those frames.
Seems such a shame to see it sit unused...or even cut up for wall art...if it could be built and make someone happy who does not share our passion/quest for detail, proportions and originality. Keep in mind that the first Arntz Cobra replicas I ever saw were made to be built on a VW chassis (yeah, I know...that's WAAAAAY back in the late '60s/early '70s and we've come a long way since then).
Cheers!
Dugly
__________________
YD,E./PNB
No names were changed to protect the innocent!
|
09-23-2016, 02:45 PM
|
|
CC Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Bedford,
NY
Cobra Make, Engine: SPO 963, 351W
Posts: 200
|
|
Not Ranked
Quote:
Originally Posted by YerDugliness
Just curious...to whom would we refer the OP if he wanted someone to build a frame for just that purpose...I know there is Mr. Bruce, but aren't there other sources for chassis without the bodies (no disrespect for Mr. Bruce intended, I'm just curious about other sources, too)?
In the past various companies would sell chassis plans...the Kelmark GT (a "Dino replica"...sort of... ) comes to mind, which was originally designed to fit a shortened VW floorpan, but when built with the "Olds Toronado" powertrain required a purpose built frame...Kelmark sold plans for those frames.
Seems such a shame to see it sit unused...or even cut up for wall art...if it could be built and make someone happy who does not share our passion/quest for detail, proportions and originality. Keep in mind that the first Arntz Cobra replicas I ever saw were made to be built on a VW chassis (yeah, I know...that's WAAAAAY back in the late '60s/early '70s and we've come a long way since then).
Cheers!
Dugly
|
I'd speak with the Art Morrison folks to build a "track day" chassis for it, and have a ball with it.
|
09-23-2016, 09:13 PM
|
|
CC Member/Contributor
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Greenville,
SC
Cobra Make, Engine: 70 Shelby convertible, ERA-289 FIA, 65 Sunbeam Tiger, mystery Ford powered 2dr convertible
Posts: 12,703
|
|
Not Ranked
Quote:
Originally Posted by Karl Bebout
Jack and his body shop Mgr Carl, both told me an original was used. Don't remember what number. They were very heavy glass.
|
Their original sales brochures (both the early and later versions), options and prices list in my collection do not mention a splashed body or a chassis number associated with it.
Bill S
__________________
Instead of being part of the problem, be part of a successful solution.
First time Cobra buyers-READ THIS
|
09-24-2016, 01:27 PM
|
CC Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Colorado Springs,
Co
Cobra Make, Engine: Cobra FF5/BBM 482
Posts: 155
|
|
Not Ranked
Bill,
how much differant were the NAF's from an original, was it just shape or dimensions
|
09-24-2016, 01:44 PM
|
|
CC Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: White City,
SK
Cobra Make, Engine: West Coast, 460 CID
Posts: 2,908
|
|
Not Ranked
Quote:
Originally Posted by feadam
Bill,
how much differant were the NAF's from an original, was it just shape or dimensions
|
Here's one perspective on that - profile photos of selected replicas against csX 3155: Compare car profiles
Another NAF: http://www.allcarindex.com/auto-car-...tes-NAF-Cobra/
__________________
Brian
Last edited by cycleguy55; 09-24-2016 at 01:53 PM..
|
09-24-2016, 06:15 PM
|
|
CC Member/Contributor
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Greenville,
SC
Cobra Make, Engine: 70 Shelby convertible, ERA-289 FIA, 65 Sunbeam Tiger, mystery Ford powered 2dr convertible
Posts: 12,703
|
|
Not Ranked
Quote:
Originally Posted by feadam
Bill,
how much differant were the NAF's from an original, was it just shape or dimensions
|
Both in dimensions and in shape, NAF did an Ok job at getting the body to fit their frame set up, but the body was off as you can see in the side by side shots from the ERA web site.
That also shows why the body in question, in this thread, is not a NAF
__________________
Instead of being part of the problem, be part of a successful solution.
First time Cobra buyers-READ THIS
|
09-24-2016, 08:35 PM
|
|
CC Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: St. Lucia, West Indies,
WI
Cobra Make, Engine: Unique 427SC 383 stroker
Posts: 3,767
|
|
Not Ranked
Quote:
Originally Posted by mrmustang
Not a Hi Tech body either, and the NAF body does not have as pronounced a front or rear fender as the OP's body does.
Might I also add, this body is a grossly extended wheelbase
|
Wrong. In the picture below, an exact trace of the body lines from the mystery body has been overlaid on the known NAF replica. The line image was placed over the photo, rotated and constrain scaled (proportions unchanged) to fit over the NAF. Given that the photos were taken from slightly different heights and angles, it is a very close match. The wheel opening shapes and the front and rear wheel arches are bang on. If we fail to agree on that, at least we can agree that the body in question is NOT a "grossly extended wheelbase."
__________________
Tropical Buzz
Grant me the serenity to accept the things I cannot change, the strength to change the things I can, and the wisdom to know the difference. -(wasn't me)
BEWARE OF THE DOGma!! Dogmatism bites...
|
09-25-2016, 04:27 AM
|
|
CC Member/Contributor
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Greenville,
SC
Cobra Make, Engine: 70 Shelby convertible, ERA-289 FIA, 65 Sunbeam Tiger, mystery Ford powered 2dr convertible
Posts: 12,703
|
|
Not Ranked
Buzz,
I respectfully disagree. You'll see it when you start comparing flare dimensions, and other dimensions using the different shots in the OP's photographs.
__________________
Instead of being part of the problem, be part of a successful solution.
First time Cobra buyers-READ THIS
|
09-26-2016, 05:02 AM
|
CC Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Colorado Springs,
Co
Cobra Make, Engine: Cobra FF5/BBM 482
Posts: 155
|
|
Not Ranked
Bill,
Are the mold lines on the body the same as NAF would have been, or did the molds they used split somewhere else? Asking because I saw an NAF body with mold lines and they seem to be in same place. Do you have any pictures of your NAF before paint you could share?
Last edited by feadam; 09-26-2016 at 05:04 AM..
|
09-26-2016, 05:10 AM
|
|
CC Member/Contributor
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Greenville,
SC
Cobra Make, Engine: 70 Shelby convertible, ERA-289 FIA, 65 Sunbeam Tiger, mystery Ford powered 2dr convertible
Posts: 12,703
|
|
Not Ranked
Quote:
Originally Posted by feadam
Bill,
Are the mold lines on the body the same as NAF would have been, or did the molds they used split somewhere else? Asking because I saw an NAF body with mold lines and they seem to be in same place. Do you have any pictures of your NAF before paint you could share?
|
I've got boxes from when I last moved full of things like that, mostly Polaroid Instamatic type pictures as there were no digital cameras back then. I'll be home this coming weekend, will try to dig through some of them at that time, if I of course have the time to do so.
Bill
__________________
Instead of being part of the problem, be part of a successful solution.
First time Cobra buyers-READ THIS
|
09-26-2016, 02:56 PM
|
|
CC Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Viersen-Germany,
Posts: 23
|
|
Not Ranked
Hi,
if this can help, here are some typical NAF corners
hood area corners:
door front body area
body door rear area, with removed seal
and if the inner shell is available , the NAF logo
Frank
|
09-26-2016, 10:56 PM
|
CC Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Colorado Springs,
Co
Cobra Make, Engine: Cobra FF5/BBM 482
Posts: 155
|
|
Not Ranked
Frank,
Thanks it does help, the hood pictures are exactly the same where the stops locate.
|
09-27-2016, 09:20 AM
|
|
CC Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Mesa,
AZ
Cobra Make, Engine: ERA #2119 289FIA
Posts: 5,380
|
|
Not Ranked
The pictured stops are also where they were on my long gone NAF. The frame on mine was 2"x4" boxed tubing, .180"thick. Pretty stout but I installed "X" members front and rear to prevent flexing. (My 496 RAT had twisted the frame so much that I'd carry the LF wheel through 2nd gear with my TH400). My MT drag radials hooked up pretty well. ha
__________________
Karlos
"In the Land of the Pigs, The Butcher is King"
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:05 AM.
Links monetized by VigLink
|