Main Menu
|
Nevada Classics
|
Advertise at CC
|
S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
23 |
24 |
25 |
26 |
27 |
28 |
29 |
30 |
31 |
|
|
CC Advertisers
|
|
12-24-2008, 08:48 AM
|
|
CC Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Richmond,
RI
Cobra Make, Engine: Superformance #1676
Posts: 133
|
|
Not Ranked
Quote:
Originally Posted by ZOERA-SC7XX
Maybe he's gettin' ready to make some 'continuation' Daytonas and doesn't want the competition. He can sell 'em for six figures to some guys who'll call 'em real. Does anyone know how many 'hardtop' manufacturers are out there? This may just be the first volley.
|
http://www.shelbydistributionusa.com/CSX9000.aspx
|
12-24-2008, 08:52 AM
|
CC Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Phoenix,
AZ
Cobra Make, Engine: FFR: 302 w/aluminum heads, Edlebrock injection. Street car trim, no scoop, side pipes or rollbar.
Posts: 1,869
|
|
Not Ranked
This place should give the Old Grouch a little fairer treatment than the KooLaid drinkers.
Wow Bruce you sure don't mind trying to sell shi'ite to those loser kool-aid drinkers do you? No wonder you use a different name over there.
BTW, I wonder if 'Ol Shel has seen the pics of the Cobra copies you've made? What makes you any different than FFR other than not being named in the suit?
__________________
"Cobra-Cobra-bo-bobra, banana-fanna-fo-fobra, fe-fi-mo-mobra...Cobra!"
|
12-24-2008, 09:18 AM
|
Senior ClubCobra Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Northern,
Ca
Cobra Make, Engine: LA Exotics
Posts: 1,037
|
|
Not Ranked
While I'm all in favor of protecting Intellectual Property, Trademarks, and the like, I am confused by the data on file at the patent office. While I'm no trademark expert, a search at the trademark office provides the following.
Daytona - a common trademark. Not currently used as a trademark for a car
Shelby Daytona Coupe - an abandoned trademark. Abandoned in 1996. Even when it was in effect; "NO CLAIM IS MADE TO THE EXCLUSIVE RIGHT TO USE "DAYTONA COUPE" APART FROM THE MARK AS SHOWN" (mark was not shown in filing)
http://tess2.uspto.gov/bin/showfield...ate=j7pasa.8.2
Daytona Coupe - an abandoned trademark
http://tess2.uspto.gov/bin/showfield...te=j7pasa.13.1
Cobra - a common trademark. Not currently used as a trademark for a car. At least I couldn't find it.
http://tess2.uspto.gov/bin/showfield...h=Submit+Query
|
12-24-2008, 09:35 AM
|
Senior ClubCobra Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Northern,
Ca
Cobra Make, Engine: LA Exotics
Posts: 1,037
|
|
Not Ranked
'Shelby Cobra' also abandoned as a trademark.
|
12-24-2008, 09:53 AM
|
CC Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Driftwood,
TX
Cobra Make, Engine: Contemporary Cobra, 427 side oiler
Posts: 1,850
|
|
Not Ranked
Quote:
Originally Posted by RandyH
If you believe so strongly then you support Hurricane being sued out of existence or anyone doing business with them?
|
Read my post again, that is not what I wrote. What I wrote was "should have had to pay a royalty or at least been granted consent." ONE or BOTH of those events should have taken place in advance of entering into a business endeavor using what Shelby claims is his property, not after. And both events generally remove forever any need for litigation. The Hurricanes and FFRs and everyone else using his trademarks and designs could have sought consent via licensing from Shelby in advance of any litigation, but chose not to. So, if they get sued, they deserve it. If it puts them out of business, well if they were commercializing off of Shelby's property, then they weren't legitimately in business in the first place then were they?
|
12-24-2008, 10:47 AM
|
|
CC Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Winnipeg, MB,
MB
Cobra Make, Engine: FFR Cobra Serial #1425, 2007 SHELBY MUSTANG GT500, 2000 Cobra R #15
Posts: 77
|
|
Not Ranked
That will a tough one to win for Shelby since he LOST the 1st case against FFR.
As well, the meta tags are a fricking joke.
I hate him more than ever.
MM
|
12-24-2008, 10:53 AM
|
CC Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Northern,
CA
Cobra Make, Engine: Still Working on This
Posts: 301
|
|
Not Ranked
What Exactly is Intellectual Property (IP)?
In my company/industry vertical, we protect our IP as the most valuable commodity we have (which it really is). Everything an employee creates or patents becomes the property of the larger corportion; it is a condition of employment.
While I have sympathy for FFR and others, I think a case could be made (recognizing that I am not an attorney), that the Daytona Coupe was part of the IP of the original Shelby organization; assuming that the terms of employment followed the standard pattern as mentioned above. I would perhaps not say the same thing about the Cobra, due to where body originated, etc.
Again, this is not a legal opinion, just a reflection of how other industry verticals deal with IP (assuming the Daytona Coupe is considered IP).
|
12-24-2008, 11:17 AM
|
CC Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Hillsboro,
OR
Cobra Make, Engine: Scratch built CSX style frame, Carbon fiber body, 393 Stroker, T-bird IRS, T5
Posts: 1,623
|
|
Not Ranked
Where the rub comes in is that the Old Man didn't protect his intellectual property for a long number of years. In my limited understanding, that creates a condition where the IP becomes a public property and is available for use. Even trademarks are only protected for a certain number or years if not renewed or protected.
If you read the copy of the suit filed, it states clearly that the "Daytona Coupe" are NOT protected or trademarked, but obviously Ole Shel has determined he has a right to their exlcusive rights anyway?
Much of this suit has been settled once already in the first suit and I assume will be dismissed again with this filing without going to the "jury trial" demanded by the Shelby lawyers.
A quick question here-
At the time FFR and many other manufacturers started making their replicas of the Shelby Cobra, was their even an entity in place that they could have applied for permission?
My understanding is that Ole Shel' had pretty much abandoned the Cobra and everything else in that realm and was living in South Africa or somewhere else pursuing other interests?
IMHO, and I believe in the opinion of the legal objectives here, once the brand has been abandoned for a length of time, it is available to whoever wishes to use it without restrictions. That would obviously preclude the need for paying of royalties in this instance, on top of the fact that the royalties Shelby demanded after the fact were ridiculously over estimated.
Bruce, I also find it very disengenous of you to play one side on this forum and have your hand out on the other forum under a different name. A little sour grapes from not being able to sell your warers, bodies, and/or molds to Factory Five?
|
12-24-2008, 11:27 AM
|
|
California Dreamin Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Hollywood,
FL
Cobra Make, Engine:
Posts: 611
|
|
Not Ranked
Quote:
Originally Posted by bdeutsch
In my company/industry vertical, we protect our IP as the most valuable commodity we have (which it really is). Everything an employee creates or patents becomes the property of the larger corportion; it is a condition of employment.
|
Wouldn't your company's most valuable asset (BTW, IP is not a commodity) be the employees that are doing the creating?
|
12-24-2008, 12:26 PM
|
CC Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: penn.,
Posts: 2,559
|
|
Not Ranked
Relax Maricopa, the KoolAid drinkers reference was a joke son. As for all the "Cobra" stuff I make, you're rite I ain't named in the lawsuit, so let's all just sitback and let the big boys settle in court.
|
12-24-2008, 12:43 PM
|
CC Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Northern,
CA
Cobra Make, Engine: Still Working on This
Posts: 301
|
|
Not Ranked
Point made on the employee question, but at least in our company (and it may be different in others), IP (hard and soft) is treated as a corporate commodity (without trying to get into a discussion of relative difference in terms between industry verticals).
Bottom line, as suggested by Mr. Bruce, the attorneys will be the one fighting this one out me thinks.
|
12-24-2008, 01:37 PM
|
|
California Dreamin Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Hollywood,
FL
Cobra Make, Engine:
Posts: 611
|
|
Not Ranked
Ask your attorneys if they treat your IP as a commodity or an asset.
Sorry for the hijack, back to more interesting matters.
|
12-24-2008, 02:18 PM
|
CC Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Northern,
CA
Cobra Make, Engine: Still Working on This
Posts: 301
|
|
Not Ranked
Agree...
I was equating asset to commodity and was thinking about our Legal reviews when thinking that there might be a better way to state...
Funny how things always come down to the attorneys...
|
12-24-2008, 02:43 PM
|
|
Super Moderator
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Fresno,
CA
Cobra Make, Engine: KMP 184/482ci Shelby
Posts: 14,448
|
|
Not Ranked
Yes...it is funny. Now let's stay on track, shall we?
__________________
Jamo
|
12-24-2008, 03:19 PM
|
|
Senior Club Cobra Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Rowlett,
TX
Cobra Make, Engine: Hurricane Motorsports; KC408w: 546HP/ 553TQ
Posts: 1,164
|
|
Not Ranked
Personally, I would rather see the GR1 concept car be produced by Shelby.
__________________
Cobra Mathematics: 0-100-0 < 12
2011 TCC President
JSHEL1 on the Web
|
12-24-2008, 03:43 PM
|
|
CC Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: fremont,
ca
Cobra Make, Engine: superformance/427 fe ford
Posts: 436
|
|
Not Ranked
does his mean that all the other auto maker can go after all the companies that make up grade parts? of say any company that makes fiberglass replacement parts? where do these lawsuits end? and just don't think that if the old man kicks the bucket that the law suits end, i am sure he has something set up for after he's gone where his family and foundations still make money.
__________________
1952 MG TD - 53 HP 1970 SS454 Chevelle - 900hp 2007 spo2669 - 485hp 2001 Spclconst. softtail - 114HP 2006 Roadglide - 88HP
sold Roadglide.....bought 09 XR 1200 - 90 hp stock
i would rather live one day as a lion, than one thousand days as a lamb.
|
12-24-2008, 03:48 PM
|
|
CC Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: fremont,
ca
Cobra Make, Engine: superformance/427 fe ford
Posts: 436
|
|
Not Ranked
__________________
1952 MG TD - 53 HP 1970 SS454 Chevelle - 900hp 2007 spo2669 - 485hp 2001 Spclconst. softtail - 114HP 2006 Roadglide - 88HP
sold Roadglide.....bought 09 XR 1200 - 90 hp stock
i would rather live one day as a lion, than one thousand days as a lamb.
Last edited by Jamo; 12-24-2008 at 06:26 PM..
|
12-24-2008, 05:13 PM
|
CC Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Driftwood,
TX
Cobra Make, Engine: Contemporary Cobra, 427 side oiler
Posts: 1,850
|
|
Not Ranked
Quote:
Originally Posted by vanoochka
Wouldn't your company's most valuable asset (BTW, IP is not a commodity) be the employees that are doing the creating?
|
In my opinion that depends on who owns/runs the company. To some, the assets of a company DO go home at night. To others, we are all just Pokie and Gumbie. But to bdeutsch's point, in the last 20 years companies have finally figured out that everything they ever do is potentially of future value, so everything that can be is trademarked, copyrighted etc. But if in fact Shelby allowed his rights to lapse, as is being suggested, then he may find it hard to assert claims that he owns the Daytona Coupe and any commercially available likeness. Surely the FFR boys would be smart enough to not jump in the murky shark-infested waters twice and have sought legal advice before launching the "Type 65." I guess we'll all see.
Last edited by elmariachi; 12-24-2008 at 05:15 PM..
|
12-24-2008, 07:34 PM
|
|
CC Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Mickleton,
NJ
Cobra Make, Engine: Planning an FFR Roadster build
Posts: 32
|
|
Not Ranked
As I read this latest suit, it seems to be aimed more towards the Daytona Coupe as his intellectual property. I remember his put down of Pete Brock for the original design of the coupe; now he wants to add his name to the SPF Coupe, as updated by the same Pete Brock, as the new CSX9000 series continuation car. Of course, he'll also add a bunch of bucks to the price tag as his profit.
Years ago, he lost interest in Cobras and let his trademarks and patents lapse while he pursued other interests. Now he wants it all back, with interest! To me, he is just a bitter old man. I feel sorry for him. The real damage to his reputation, and his legend, is being done by himself! While I respect what he and the team accomplished 40 years ago, I have lost all respect for him now.
|
12-24-2008, 07:40 PM
|
|
CC Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 1999
Location: Carmichael, ca. USA,
Ca
Cobra Make, Engine: FFR-4000 under construction
Posts: 235
|
|
Not Ranked
Quote:
Originally Posted by Three Peaks
Where the rub comes in is that the Old Man didn't protect his intellectual property for a long number of years. In my limited understanding, that creates a condition where the IP becomes a public property and is available for use. Even trademarks are only protected for a certain number or years if not renewed or protected.
If you read the copy of the suit filed, it states clearly that the "Daytona Coupe" are NOT protected or trademarked, but obviously Ole Shel has determined he has a right to their exlcusive rights anyway?
Much of this suit has been settled once already in the first suit and I assume will be dismissed again with this filing without going to the "jury trial" demanded by the Shelby lawyers.
A quick question here-
At the time FFR and many other manufacturers started making their replicas of the Shelby Cobra, was their even an entity in place that they could have applied for permission?
My understanding is that Ole Shel' had pretty much abandoned the Cobra and everything else in that realm and was living in South Africa or somewhere else pursuing other interests?
IMHO, and I believe in the opinion of the legal objectives here, once the brand has been abandoned for a length of time, it is available to whoever wishes to use it without restrictions. That would obviously preclude the need for paying of royalties in this instance, on top of the fact that the royalties Shelby demanded after the fact were ridiculously over estimated.
Bruce, I also find it very disengenous of you to play one side on this forum and have your hand out on the other forum under a different name. A little sour grapes from not being able to sell your warers, bodies, and/or molds to Factory Five?
|
Three Peaks, Thank you, what you have explained is the core reason why Shelby lost the first time and will loose again this time.
Don
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:46 AM.
Links monetized by VigLink
|