Club Cobra GasN Exhaust  

Go Back   Club Cobra > Cobra Talk Areas > ALL COBRA TALK

MMG Superformance
Nevada Classics
Keith Craft Racing
Main Menu
Module Jump:
Nevada Classics
Nevada Classics
MMG Superformance
Advertise at CC
Banner Ad Rates
Keith Craft Racing
MMG Superformance
Keith Craft Racing
December 2024
S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30 31        

Kirkham Motorsports

Like Tree2Likes

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 10-01-2009, 08:59 AM
SunDude's Avatar
CC Member
Visit my Photo Gallery

 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Ottawa, ON
Cobra Make, Engine: 2002 Superformance w/392 stroker
Posts: 1,623
Not Ranked     
Default What is the drag coefficient of a Cobra roadster?

Does anyone know what the coefficient of drag (cd) and frontal area (sq.ft.) were on an original 427 Cobra roadster?
__________________
"Anyone who drives faster than you is a Maniac,
and anyone who drives slower is an Idiot." - George Carlin
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 10-01-2009, 09:02 AM
Senior Club Cobra Member
Visit my Photo Gallery

 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Cobra Make, Engine:
Posts: 15,712
Not Ranked     
Default

Gutt feeling based on knowing the numbers for some other cars.

.41 or higher, a real brick.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 10-01-2009, 10:31 AM
RodKnock's Avatar
Senior Club Cobra Member
Visit my Photo Gallery

 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Cobra Make, Engine: KMP 539, a Ton of Aluminum
Posts: 9,591
Not Ranked     
Default

Less than 1.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 10-01-2009, 11:23 AM
Senior Club Cobra Member
Visit my Photo Gallery

 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Cobra Make, Engine:
Posts: 15,712
Not Ranked     
Default

Here's an example of what I'm talking about "gutt feeling". First and Second generation Mazda Miata. Wheel base, size, weight all comparable to a Cobra. MUCH smaller frontal area, looks like it would have a pretty good CD. In fact Miata's are .38 which is pretty high, much higher than many modern cars. Therefore, Cobra's having even more frontal air and a much larger grill opening couldn't be any better. A .41 estimate is likely cutting them some slack!

Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 10-01-2009, 11:46 AM
patrickt's Avatar
Half-Ass Member
Visit my Photo Gallery

 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Cobra Make, Engine: ERA #732, 428FE (447 CID), TKO600, Solid Flat Tappet Cam, Tons of Aluminum
Posts: 22,005
Not Ranked     
Default

I've seen more than a couple of calculations that list it at .42 -- a brick it is.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 10-01-2009, 12:26 PM
Bob In Ct's Avatar
Senior Club Cobra Member
Visit my Photo Gallery

 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Southern Connecticut, CT
Cobra Make, Engine: SPF - 351W, 944 non-turbo
Posts: 2,105
Not Ranked     
Default

All you have to do is ride in one to know that air does not go over or around the car very smoothly. Keeping a hat on is all but impossible. The steep windshield (by today's standards) does not help.

Bob
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 10-01-2009, 12:33 PM
patrickt's Avatar
Half-Ass Member
Visit my Photo Gallery

 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Cobra Make, Engine: ERA #732, 428FE (447 CID), TKO600, Solid Flat Tappet Cam, Tons of Aluminum
Posts: 22,005
Not Ranked     
Default

A Hummer is about the only modern car I can think of off the top of my head that it beats. The lowly Prius comes in around .27, if memory serves.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 10-01-2009, 12:48 PM
CC Member
Visit my Photo Gallery

 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Cobra Make, Engine:
Posts: 416
Not Ranked     
Default

Forgive my ignorance, but I take it the lower number is more aerodynamically slippery?

Hard to imagine a Cobra worse than a Miata based on the pic above. Just look at the giant side mirrors on the Miata and compare to the bullit pointy side-mirror on a Cobra.........LOL.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 10-01-2009, 12:49 PM
patrickt's Avatar
Half-Ass Member
Visit my Photo Gallery

 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Cobra Make, Engine: ERA #732, 428FE (447 CID), TKO600, Solid Flat Tappet Cam, Tons of Aluminum
Posts: 22,005
Not Ranked     
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Argess View Post
Forgive my ignorance, but I take it the lower number is more aerodynamically slippery?
Yes, lower is better.
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 10-01-2009, 12:53 PM
patrickt's Avatar
Half-Ass Member
Visit my Photo Gallery

 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Cobra Make, Engine: ERA #732, 428FE (447 CID), TKO600, Solid Flat Tappet Cam, Tons of Aluminum
Posts: 22,005
Not Ranked     
Default ... and it's harder than you think to tell just by looking

Most people would bet that a Lamborghini Countach would not have the same CoD as the Cobra, when actually they're very, very close.


Last edited by patrickt; 10-01-2009 at 12:58 PM.. Reason: Added the pic
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 10-01-2009, 03:33 PM
Silverback51's Avatar
Senior Club Cobra Member
Visit my Photo Gallery

 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Covington, wa
Cobra Make, Engine: Superformance # 532, 466 BB, 560HP
Posts: 3,027
Not Ranked     
Default

It's better than a 4 X 8 sheet of plywood, but not by much.
TheExtreme likes this.
__________________
John Hall
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 10-01-2009, 05:02 PM
greg schroeder's Avatar
CC Member
Visit my Photo Gallery

 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Scottsdale, AZ
Cobra Make, Engine: Superformance, Roush 427R-095, Pro Systems carb, 2" headers, Buckshot Racefab side pipes, 10s off idle start
Posts: 705
Not Ranked     
Default

I figured it out a while ago based on rear wheel HP on a dyno and then HP loss at speed using a G-tech compition meter. It does look to be over .4 as mentioned. The usable HP at higher speeds has a huge loss from resistance. Over 120 or so mph it becomes a real challenge and even seems to require diffrent jeting there's so much load.

This is third gear with a few charts and assorted changes. It came out to be about 100 HP of energy loss around 110 mph. The faster you go the loss becomes exponential. The car on the dyno was making about 475 at the wheels when it made about 340 or 350 in motion of usable power.




Here's a formula.

http://www.gtechprosupport.com/support/AeroDragCalc.php
__________________
off idle drag pass, DA 750ft.

Last edited by greg schroeder; 10-01-2009 at 05:31 PM..
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 10-01-2009, 06:56 PM
CC Member
Visit my Photo Gallery

 
Join Date: May 2007
Cobra Make, Engine: JCF supplied the body,frame,and some of the driveline-I completed it to be a very accurate 289 slabside
Posts: 149
Not Ranked     
Default

The drag coefficient Cd has nothing to do with the size of the car,only the shape. The total drag force is proportional to the frontal area times Cd times speed squared.
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 10-01-2009, 07:23 PM
ZOERA-SC7XX's Avatar
Senior Club Cobra Member
Visit my Photo Gallery

 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Meriden, CT
Cobra Make, Engine: ERA 427 SC s/n 718, 428 FE
Posts: 1,731
Not Ranked     
Default

If I remember correctly, that's why Shelby developed the Cobra Daytona coupe. The roadster just didn't want to run much over 160 mph.
__________________
"Paint It Black, Black As Night"
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 10-01-2009, 07:24 PM
Senior Club Cobra Member
Visit my Photo Gallery

 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Cobra Make, Engine:
Posts: 15,712
Not Ranked     
Default

Just to help keep a VERY complex subject simple, I figured a Miata would be a good comparison. Similiar size, weight, shape with smaller frontal area.

BUT Patrickt brought up an interesting comparison with the Lambo, which apparently has very little frontal area and yet a CD similiar to a Cobra??

Which reminds me of the testing Shelby did when he first started working on the Ford GT-40. Overheating, terrible drag, low top speed. Due mostly, as I recall, to the many "air scoops" here there and everywhere. Which may be the Lambo's problem, big ass air scoops.

Thats some impressive work Greg!
Reply With Quote
  #16 (permalink)  
Old 10-01-2009, 07:43 PM
eschaider's Avatar
CC Member
Visit my Photo Gallery

 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Gilroy, CA
Cobra Make, Engine: SPF 2291, Whipple Blown & Injected 4V ModMotor
Posts: 2,727
Not Ranked     
Default Cobra Drag Coefficient

Here is some data out of the Bosch Automotive Handboook



We are probably pretty close to the entry for "Typical Roadster" with a Cd of 0.55

Sooo, that puts us in about the same class as a bus! Good news is we are not as bad as a truck.

Ed
tuska likes this.
__________________


Help them do what they would have done if they had known what they could do.
Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old 10-01-2009, 08:28 PM
Senior Club Cobra Member
Visit my Photo Gallery

 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Cobra Make, Engine:
Posts: 15,712
Not Ranked     
Default

Quote:
Good news is we are not as bad as a truck.
Oh I'm just jumping up and down over the good news...
Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)  
Old 10-01-2009, 08:32 PM
lovehamr's Avatar
Stolen Avitar
Visit my Photo Gallery

 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Brunswick, GA
Cobra Make, Engine: BDR 1311 428PI
Posts: 3,044
Not Ranked     
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by eschaider View Post
Good news is we are not as bad as a truck.

Ed
WoooHooo!!!!!

BTW, if memory serves, that huge CD for the Countach was when it was fitted with the huge rear wing not shown in the above pic.

Steve
Reply With Quote
  #19 (permalink)  
Old 10-01-2009, 08:38 PM
Senior Club Cobra Member
Visit my Photo Gallery

 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Cobra Make, Engine:
Posts: 15,712
Not Ranked     
Default

Ah, good point. Same rule would apply to the fuel dragster which you KNOW is a pretty slick setup. It's the WING all right!

Man, wasn't Peter Brock something when "back in the day" with a limited understanding of CD he designed the Coupe!
Reply With Quote
  #20 (permalink)  
Old 10-01-2009, 08:59 PM
JAC's Avatar
JAC JAC is offline
CC Member
Visit my Photo Gallery

 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Hudson, WI
Cobra Make, Engine: Classic Roadsters II
Posts: 152
Not Ranked     
Default

Last time I saw this question someone posted a picture of a brick.
__________________
"COBRA" Big kids gokart
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:06 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0
The representations expressed are the representations and opinions of the clubcobra.com forum members and do not necessarily reflect the opinions and viewpoints of the site owners, moderators, Shelby American, any other replica manufacturer, Ford Motor Company. This website has been planned and developed by clubcobra.com and its forum members and should not be construed as being endorsed by Ford Motor Company, or Shelby American or any other manufacturer unless expressly noted by that entity. "Cobra" and the Cobra logo are registered trademarks for Ford Motor Co., Inc. clubcobra.com forum members agree not to post any copyrighted material unless the copyrighted material is owned by you. Although we do not and cannot review the messages posted and are not responsible for the content of any of these messages, we reserve the right to delete any message for any reason whatsoever. You remain solely responsible for the content of your messages, and you agree to indemnify and hold us harmless with respect to any claim based upon transmission of your message(s). Thank you for visiting clubcobra.com. For full policy documentation refer to the following link: CC Policy
Links monetized by VigLink