Absolute Pace

Go Back   Club Cobra > Club Forums > Australian Cobra Club

Welcome to Club Cobra!  The World's largest non biased Shelby Cobra related site!

  •  » Representation from nearly all Cobra/Daytona/GT40 manufacturers
  •  » Help from all over the world for your questions
  •  » Build logs for you and all members
  •  » Blogs
  •  » Image Gallery
  •  » Many thousands of members and nearly 1 million posts! 

YES! I want to register an account for free right now!  p.s.: For registered members this ad will NOT show

MMG Superformance
Nevada Classics
Keith Craft Racing
Main Menu
Nevada Classics
Nevada Classics
Keith Craft Racing
Advertise at CC
Banner Ad Rates
MMG Superformance
MMG Superformance
MMG Superformance
Keith Craft Racing
November 2024
S M T W T F S
          1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30

Kirkham Motorsports

Like Tree1Likes

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 10-27-2009, 04:15 AM
CC Member
Visit my Photo Gallery

 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 110
Not Ranked     
Default Intake plumbing

I'm looking for some ideas for intake plumbing. I need to plumb the MAF and air cleaner to the throttle body. I guess a pod filter but I don't know. Can you give me some ideas please.

Peter
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 10-27-2009, 06:15 AM
CC Member
Visit my Photo Gallery

 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Melbourne, VIC
Cobra Make, Engine: DRB,Ford Tickford 302 220kw with BTR 4 speed auto, 3.9:1 LSD
Posts: 491
Not Ranked     
Default ducting

Hi Peter,

I have a pod filter behind the passanger headlight. For most of the journey from air flow sensor to throttle body I used some black ribbed ducting (rubber). Pretty sure I got it from purple pig. I think the inside diameter is around 90mm. I have used a section of aluminium tubing in the engine bay as I needed something solid to insert the air temp sensor into. I have had the aluminium section HPC coated to reduced heat soak (it runs about 8 cm above the headers).

http://www.purplepig.com.au/

Hope this helps
Regards
Cameron
__________________
Cameron
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 10-27-2009, 06:31 AM
Zedn's Avatar
CC Member
Visit my Photo Gallery

 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Sydney, NSW
Cobra Make, Engine: RCM, Jag front and rear, LS3
Posts: 1,640
Not Ranked     
Default

Quote:
black ribbed ducting (rubber)
Is that the rubber stuff?

Probably miniscule in a naturally asperated engine (not turbo), but ribbing is probably going to be quite restrictive in the airflow due to the turbulance created. Also i have seen this stuff colapse inwards in turbo charged applications.

These comments are probably totally irrelevant without forced induction, but it thought i would throw them out there.

Polished alloy or stainless looks good. Mandrel bends and polished pipe are available off ebay fairly cheap, and if you dont have tig welding facilities, silicon joints can make life easy, even in place of the bends.

In the past i have used a combination of mandrel bent 3" stainless steel bends and pipe with silicon couplings to make up some pretty crazy intercooler plumbing. Looks good and works well. Try and go with alloy though as it is lighter and easier to work with.

Also i was talking to a guy at the nationals (dont know if he is on here) who had used cake tins to make an air box. Appeared to work well.

Liam
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 10-27-2009, 03:05 PM
gjkrv8's Avatar
CC Member
Visit my Photo Gallery

 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Melbourne, VIC
Cobra Make, Engine: Classic Revival CR 3505, LS1, T56 6 Speed, VE 3.45 LSD Rear, 6 Spot AP Fronts, 4 Spot Wilwood Rears
Posts: 1,121
Not Ranked     
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pecal View Post
I'm looking for some ideas for intake plumbing. I need to plumb the MAF and air cleaner to the throttle body. I guess a pod filter but I don't know. Can you give me some ideas please.

Peter
Hey Peter,

I used some silicone tube to adapt from the Throttle body to the MAF and a K&N POd Filter. The Temp Sensor is glued into a small hole I made in the silicone tube, seem to work ok. Is not a cold air system but am not looking for that kind of small perf improvement. Got the tube from Autobahn.

Rgds

Gregg

Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 10-27-2009, 06:32 PM
sambo's Avatar
CC Member
Visit my Photo Gallery

 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Melbourne, VIC
Cobra Make, Engine: Harrison, 6.0L Chev
Posts: 2,513
Not Ranked     
Default

Gregg, OTR (over the radiator) intake designs commonly report 10-15kW gains compared to the the factory airbox, which I believe on the VE draws cold air from inside the front guard. I don't have any real proof, but I reckon a pod filter drawing air from behind the radiator is probably worse than a modern factory setup, let alone a custom cold air intake. It would certainly be interesting to log the intake temps and compare different designs.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 10-27-2009, 08:36 PM
CC Member
Visit my Photo Gallery

 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: The Hills, NSW
Cobra Make, Engine: Absolute Pace
Posts: 1,354
Not Ranked     
Default

Sounds about right.

When I last had my car on the dyno it was a really hot day.

Opening the bonnet gained 7 kW!

Now I have a smaller radiator and will be fitting a cold air intake over the top.

Ben
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 10-27-2009, 10:04 PM
CC Member
Visit my Photo Gallery

 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Cobra Make, Engine:
Posts: 187
Not Ranked     
Default

I would look at an over the radiator system (OTRCAI) made from decent material. There are utubes around of ebay OTRCAI which literally collapse on themselves under wide open throttle.

The boys in blue generally frown on Pod filters more than they do OTRCAI.

And the MAF does not need to stay. Whilst they are still substantially better than the early LS models, gains can still be made via a tune and basically the MAF is wasted weight and space.

I know of some fellas doing custom OTRCAI for FI applications and others. I will invite one of them to make comment.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 10-27-2009, 10:12 PM
Zedn's Avatar
CC Member
Visit my Photo Gallery

 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Sydney, NSW
Cobra Make, Engine: RCM, Jag front and rear, LS3
Posts: 1,640
Not Ranked     
Default

I am sceptical about what the real gains are of cold intake systems. They do offer a performance improvement, but at what rev range under what conditions. I suspect your 15kw would be at peak power when the engine is generating heat.

A dyno print out would be interesting to see. Im sure there would be one somewhere on the net.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 10-27-2009, 10:38 PM
CC Member
Visit my Photo Gallery

 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Melbourne, VIC
Cobra Make, Engine: DRB,Ford Tickford 302 220kw with BTR 4 speed auto, 3.9:1 LSD
Posts: 491
Not Ranked     
Default yep

Hi Liam,

Yes your right the rubber tubing is metal ribbed and yes it would create some turbulance which is why I went for 90mm id whilst my throttle body is only 75mm id.

In regards to surfaces. The inside surface of the intake should not be too smooth either as this will also create turbulance as the air will stick to the smooth surface.
__________________
Cameron
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 10-27-2009, 11:28 PM
sambo's Avatar
CC Member
Visit my Photo Gallery

 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Melbourne, VIC
Cobra Make, Engine: Harrison, 6.0L Chev
Posts: 2,513
Not Ranked     
Default

Here's an LS1 forum link with dyno chart for a VY SS. This is an LS1 with smaller intake diameter and MAF in place.

http://www.ls1.com.au/forum/showthread.php?t=49026

And here's the direct link to the dyno chart pic.


Last edited by sambo; 10-27-2009 at 11:31 PM..
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 10-28-2009, 12:37 AM
Zedn's Avatar
CC Member
Visit my Photo Gallery

 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Sydney, NSW
Cobra Make, Engine: RCM, Jag front and rear, LS3
Posts: 1,640
Not Ranked     
Default

Thats interesting Sambo,

Seems the biggest improvement is in the Torque, and power improvement is right up top.

It appears that graph is going from a factory intake that is more restrictive so im not sure how accurate that is.

Dont get me wrong, there will always be improvement gains from cold air. It is more dense and hence you get more oxygen with the same volume of air. I just think that sometimes CAI is hyped a bit.
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 10-28-2009, 01:07 AM
Aussie Mike's Avatar
CC Member
Visit my Photo Gallery

 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Sunbury, VIC
Cobra Make, Engine: Rat Rod Racer, LS1 & T56
Posts: 5,391
Not Ranked     
Default

Cold air does make a big difference to an LS1. Not just because it's denser but because the LS1 employs an IAT sensor (Intake Air Temp). The ECU uses this temp reading when determining how much ignition advance to give the motor. That's where the power gains are made.

Cheers
__________________
Mike Murphy
Melbourne Australia

Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 10-28-2009, 01:27 AM
Zedn's Avatar
CC Member
Visit my Photo Gallery

 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Sydney, NSW
Cobra Make, Engine: RCM, Jag front and rear, LS3
Posts: 1,640
Not Ranked     
Default

Quote:
The ECU uses this temp reading when determining how much ignition advance to give the motor.
Yes, agreed. The improvements of cold air are well proven in both injected and carby applications. You only need to go to a drag strip and watch the cars get faster as the night air gets cooler to see this.

Thinking about this further, this was most likely done by bringing the car to operating temp and then running on the dyno with what appears to be a 3rd gear pull (i think). There would most likely be even more benifits over time with the heat soak in the engine bay (especially if on a track).

I imagine in a cobra this would not be such a problem though with the hood scoop and side vents.
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 10-28-2009, 03:12 AM
CC Member
Visit my Photo Gallery

 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 110
Not Ranked     
Default

Thanks for all the info. There is a wealth of knowledge on this forum. From what I understand mafless is the way to because it removes another restriction from the intake path. For the time being I will install the Maf. There is a lot of discussion about cold air intakes. It's pretty hard find a point where there's cold air in these engine bays.
Greg,
Your setup looks ideal, Is the silicon connecting tube stepped or are throttle body and MAF the same diameter?

Peter
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 10-28-2009, 03:54 AM
BJ's Snake's Avatar
CC Member
Visit my Photo Gallery

 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Queanbeyan, NSW
Cobra Make, Engine: AP 289 USRRC #98 The Ken Miles Tribute Car
Posts: 1,134
Not Ranked     
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pecal View Post
Thanks for all the info. There is a wealth of knowledge on this forum.
You Chev fella's need all the help you can get

Cheers
Rog246 likes this.
__________________
289 FIA Cobras RULE!
Reply With Quote
  #16 (permalink)  
Old 10-28-2009, 04:08 AM
sambo's Avatar
CC Member
Visit my Photo Gallery

 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Melbourne, VIC
Cobra Make, Engine: Harrison, 6.0L Chev
Posts: 2,513
Not Ranked     
Default

Peter, I know on the LS2/L98/LS3 the throttle body and MAF are both 90mm outside diameter. So a single piece of constant diam pipe should do the trick for us.

Regarding Gregg's photo, I would be inclined to draw air from the bottom of the engine bay rather than at the top where stagnant warm air will be collecting (no offense Gregg, just my opinion!). Perhaps a 90 degree elbow pointing down at the point where Gregg's air filter is located? I think Ben (Kenmer kit) has done this.

Also the hood scoop might draw air into the engine bay but it's well behind the pod filter and there's no turkey pan / carby creating a vaccum and drawing air through the scoop like on the original cars, so the actual flow is questionable.
Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old 10-28-2009, 04:24 AM
Zedn's Avatar
CC Member
Visit my Photo Gallery

 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Sydney, NSW
Cobra Make, Engine: RCM, Jag front and rear, LS3
Posts: 1,640
Not Ranked     
Default

Quote:
draw air from the bottom of the engine bay rather than at the top
Thats how they do it with a lot of the jap imports. Through into the wheel well is also common, but i imagine dirty.

They actually make an attachement that you can plumb in that has a valve that opens if the intake sucks water. Pobably useful if used at the nationals

Is there room next to the radiator?

RE: mafless - This helps reduce the impact of leaks in the intake as well since MAP sensors work off intake pressure instead of air flow like the MAF (i am assuming thats how it is done, i have no experience with the LS engines yet). I think you would struggle to notice any performance increase mafless on a stock engine as there are more restrictive parts in the system. Some MAF sensors have a filter screen on the front that can create some restriction, i have known people to remove these (dont know if this is on the LS1).
Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)  
Old 10-28-2009, 04:56 AM
gjkrv8's Avatar
CC Member
Visit my Photo Gallery

 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Melbourne, VIC
Cobra Make, Engine: Classic Revival CR 3505, LS1, T56 6 Speed, VE 3.45 LSD Rear, 6 Spot AP Fronts, 4 Spot Wilwood Rears
Posts: 1,121
Not Ranked     
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pecal View Post
Thanks for all the info. There is a wealth of knowledge on this forum. From what I understand mafless is the way to because it removes another restriction from the intake path. For the time being I will install the Maf. There is a lot of discussion about cold air intakes. It's pretty hard find a point where there's cold air in these engine bays.
Greg,
Your setup looks ideal, Is the silicon connecting tube stepped or are throttle body and MAF the same diameter?

Peter
Hi Peter, Yes, it is stepped, I cant remember the sizes but all I did was measure the throttle body and took the MAF with me to measure up and they ordered in the tube.

One day I might go the Cold air intake. Ian at CR has a neat Cold Air Intake that goes over the top of the Radiator. Probably when I take it on the track a few times and fingure out how to drive it first.

Rgds

Gregg
Reply With Quote
  #19 (permalink)  
Old 10-28-2009, 02:51 PM
schipps's Avatar
CC Member
Visit my Photo Gallery

 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Bundaberg, Queensland, QLD
Cobra Make, Engine: Harrison #73 with an L76 6 litre CHEV, T56, 6SPEED,R32 Rear end.
Posts: 470
Not Ranked     
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sambo View Post
Peter, I know on the LS2/L98/LS3 the throttle body and MAF are both 90mm outside diameter. So a single piece of constant diam pipe should do the trick for us.

.
Hey Paul, on the L76 6 litre, the throttle body is 98mm O.D and the MAF is 93 mm O.D.

Mick
__________________
Schipps
Reply With Quote
  #20 (permalink)  
Old 10-28-2009, 03:27 PM
Aussie Mike's Avatar
CC Member
Visit my Photo Gallery

 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Sunbury, VIC
Cobra Make, Engine: Rat Rod Racer, LS1 & T56
Posts: 5,391
Not Ranked     
Default

I built an under radiator cold air intake when I was running the stock manifold. It's made from 4" stainless and incorporates the IAT sensor. I'm running MAFless.





The induction noise was nice. Louder than the super quiet rego exhaust.



These days I get cold air from the hood scoop.



Cheers
__________________
Mike Murphy
Melbourne Australia


Last edited by Aussie Mike; 10-28-2009 at 03:30 PM..
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:43 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0
The representations expressed are the representations and opinions of the clubcobra.com forum members and do not necessarily reflect the opinions and viewpoints of the site owners, moderators, Shelby American, any other replica manufacturer, Ford Motor Company. This website has been planned and developed by clubcobra.com and its forum members and should not be construed as being endorsed by Ford Motor Company, or Shelby American or any other manufacturer unless expressly noted by that entity. "Cobra" and the Cobra logo are registered trademarks for Ford Motor Co., Inc. clubcobra.com forum members agree not to post any copyrighted material unless the copyrighted material is owned by you. Although we do not and cannot review the messages posted and are not responsible for the content of any of these messages, we reserve the right to delete any message for any reason whatsoever. You remain solely responsible for the content of your messages, and you agree to indemnify and hold us harmless with respect to any claim based upon transmission of your message(s). Thank you for visiting clubcobra.com. For full policy documentation refer to the following link: CC Policy