If a court so decreed, SAAC would accept a reconstructed car as the only vehicle entitled to claim the VIN, but with all the caveats associated with it, especially the fact that it was not the original.

Deleted

Not necessarily. There are many instances of vehicles being rebuilt with new components after a wreck. In CA, you are required to have a bonded agent inspect the reconstructed vehicle to ensure the VIN on the old vehicle matches the one on the new one. And the original VIN-stamping area is supposed to be removed and destroyed.

Here's a prime example of exactly what is being described. This car was nothing but a piece of a frame with a serial number. The rest is a "reconstruction".

https://www.barrett-jackson.com/Even...REATION-249541

Google "maserati birdcage" for lots more info.

Deleted

cunningham
 

Sounds rather fishy to me, opens the door to fantastic frauds. I'm feeling like I/m in the midst of such a legless scheme, JMHO

The feds refer to this as "Title Washing". an is considered a felony offense. Who is ready to reside in the Gray Bar Hotel??

This isn’t even a partial frame with a VIN number, this is just paperwork with a newly built chassis and body.

Please re-read post #81 above.

So does anyone know what happened to the original 2/3 frame with the serial number on it? Does it still exist? Or maybe when the car currently in Europe was created they destroyed the old frame?

Deleted

Yes indeed.....
It’s a replica of 2375 but in gold vs Red, fell in love with color when Wayne and I took 3021 to Amelia. There are original period parts but it’s a tribute (replica) of the real thing.
It’s fun
It stinks
It’s bad on gas
It’s got the feel if the 60’s car without the cost.
I know what it is.
So does everyone else
I am happy with it and it gets driven often.

Deleted

So the interesting bit seems to be:

KCTV, a Kansas City CBS station, reports that the dashboard VIN plate on Martinez's Corvette was removed years ago during the car's restoration and replaced with new rivets. "Many states are flexible on how the VIN is reattached after restoration," says KCTV, noting that the car already had been licensed and registered in another state. "But Kansas is not so flexible." The station adds that "the VIN number on the engine was no help," because "the original engine in the 62-year-old car had been replaced." Using a mirror, police located a third, inconsistent VIN plate in a "secret" location under the car.

A while ago another forum member was working on his father's original Cobra. He was putting in a more accurate motor, a 289, to replace a boss 302 motor that was swapped in years ago. He was also putting in a new passenger side foot box since the boss 302 motor swap involved making some modifications to the original passenger side foot box, so why not put in a new footbox when making the car more period correct looking. Well as you know there is a serial number tag on original 289 Cobra's passenger foot box attached with rivets (well after a certain serial number anyway, early Cobras do not have that tag). So I wonder if reattaching a serial number tag to a replacement passenger side foot box on an original Cobra could cause problems in Kansas?

Although in the case of the Corvette in Kansas, they found another "secret" vin under the car. I wonder what "secret" VIN means? Could it be that someone attached a VIN plate somewhere under the car for some reason? Or do all Corvettes have a standard "secret" VIN plate attached at the factory when they are built? Well I suppose the problem is that there are 2 VIN plates on the Corvette and they don't match.

Hmm, I wonder if there are some original Cobras that might have inconsistent VINs on them. Like maybe the Mister Formal Wear Cobra that had the CSX3005 body swapped onto the CSX3102 chassis? Well that was a rather special body until someone "restored" it recently.

amazingly the 2008 and the 2019 registries tell completely different stories about 2049, being curios which story the 2029 edition will tell....

Looks as if you're late to the conversation. You obviously missed post #44 entirely.

I had pointed out that the 1987 and 2008 registries told different stories too.

However from following this thread, it seems that the guy who has the title, does not have the original frame and most likely has no other parts from the original car left, so what exactly will make his eventual "restoration" of CSX 2049 worth any more than the car in Europe, which did not use any part of the original frame either?

In the end, if the guy with the title is really just going to do is buy a Kirham (or an AC Brooklands or something similar) and "restore" that into CSX 2049 with his title, I am not really sure that is really worth any more than having a really nice Cobra replica without the CSX 2049 serial number. I guess someone will be willing to pay a bit of a premium for the serial number attached to a nice replica, but how much of a premium would someone pay?

I missed that post obviously ;), sorry for crashing the party

There really ought to be a mandatory disclaimer attached to the title of all "air cars" stating: This vehicle is NOT the original car built under this VIN, nor does it contain any of it's significant original chassis, parts or components.

There are original parts being used in the reconstruction. I won't speculate on values, because every car is different and in the end, it's up to the buyers to determine what a car is worth to them.

I consider "air-cars" to be those which have no claim whatsoever to the VIN they are claiming. In the case of a car like 2049 where a chain of ownership can be demonstrated, the facts are usually clear as to how it may have been rebuilt and under what circumstances. That, in large part, is why organizations like SAAC exist and what we do our best to properly present in the various Registries.