Club Cobra Keith Craft Motorsports  

Go Back   Club Cobra > Manufacturers, Engine Builders, tools, and parts. > Contemporary Classic Forums

Keith Craft Racing
Nevada Classics
MMG Superformance
Main Menu
Module Jump:
Nevada Classics
Nevada Classics
Keith Craft Racing
Advertise at CC
Banner Ad Rates
MMG Superformance
MMG Superformance
MMG Superformance
November 2024
S M T W T F S
          1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30

Kirkham Motorsports

Like Tree2Likes

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #81 (permalink)  
Old 08-15-2010, 07:45 PM
mickmate's Avatar
Senior Club Cobra Member
Visit my Photo Gallery

 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Holderness, NH, US of A, NH
Cobra Make, Engine: CSX 4772 old iron FE
Posts: 5,499
Not Ranked     
Default

I got a piece of billet a tapered reamer and a rotary table for the milling machine to start making the conical shape of the watts brackets to fit Jag hubs. Then I went back in the thread and found the simple and effective solution that is perfectly suited to my cutting table. The hubs you show are a lot more friendly to mount brackets to but I wouldn't change to inboard brakes if there was a choice. I have found it easier to drop the whole rear end to service Jag brakes, and that was when it was fitted in a Jag. Some good ideas and discussion keeps us all thinking though.
__________________
mickmate
http://www.actoncustom.com/
Reply With Quote
  #82 (permalink)  
Old 08-16-2010, 08:55 AM
CC Member
Visit my Photo Gallery

 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Cobra Make, Engine:
Posts: 10
Not Ranked     
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mickmate View Post
The hubs you show are a lot more friendly to mount brackets to but I wouldn't change to inboard brakes if there was a choice. I have found it easier to drop the whole rear end to service Jag brakes, and that was when it was fitted in a Jag. Some good ideas and discussion keeps us all thinking though.
I am not doing a very good job of communicating my idea Yes the hubs I pictured are normally used to convert the brakes from in board to outboard, but my thought is keep the inboard discs. You have to run a rotors thick spacer between the diff and the half shaft any way so put the rotors there and run the inboard discs as normal. My thought was just to use the newer hubs for the sole purpose of having OEM mounting locations on the hub that were designed from the factory to handle that kind of pressure. mickmate, like I said before, I think your design is fantastic and the 3/8" hub material should be strong enough, I just like to think outside of the box and look at other options so I figured I would bring it up to see what people thought.

Last edited by Dazecars; 08-16-2010 at 09:16 AM..
Reply With Quote
  #83 (permalink)  
Old 08-16-2010, 08:53 PM
mickmate's Avatar
Senior Club Cobra Member
Visit my Photo Gallery

 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Holderness, NH, US of A, NH
Cobra Make, Engine: CSX 4772 old iron FE
Posts: 5,499
Not Ranked     
Default

I understand what you're suggesting and it would be a good use of existing bracketry. First Cobras used inboard discs but they were moved outboard due to overheating and poor serviceability.
__________________
mickmate
http://www.actoncustom.com/
Reply With Quote
  #84 (permalink)  
Old 08-16-2010, 09:03 PM
CC Member
Visit my Photo Gallery

 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Cobra Make, Engine:
Posts: 10
Not Ranked     
Default

I am a dork, I read through what you had written and I realized you were saying, if you had outboard disc hubs you would run outboard discs. Sorry Do you have an ETA or idea of $$ when you will be ready to sell
Reply With Quote
  #85 (permalink)  
Old 08-17-2010, 01:28 AM
CC Member
Visit my Photo Gallery

 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Cobra Make, Engine: Unique Motorcars 289 USRRC, 1964 289 stroked to 331, toploader
Posts: 1,088
Not Ranked     
Default

Seems as though I read about an outboard brake conversion for the jag based on newer jag parts that were interchangeable from another newer model... I think it was from the jag lovers site, but I can't quite remember. Anyone else ever see that? What was it?
Reply With Quote
  #86 (permalink)  
Old 08-17-2010, 05:37 AM
mickmate's Avatar
Senior Club Cobra Member
Visit my Photo Gallery

 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Holderness, NH, US of A, NH
Cobra Make, Engine: CSX 4772 old iron FE
Posts: 5,499
Not Ranked     
Default

I think one of our CCX guys is putting that on his car now with XJ40 parts. After the prototype worked so well I'm working on another batch and will have prices within a couple of weeks.
__________________
mickmate
http://www.actoncustom.com/
Reply With Quote
  #87 (permalink)  
Old 08-17-2010, 10:17 AM
CC Member
Visit my Photo Gallery

 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Cobra Make, Engine:
Posts: 10
Not Ranked     
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PDUB View Post
Seems as though I read about an outboard brake conversion for the jag based on newer jag parts that were interchangeable from another newer model... I think it was from the jag lovers site, but I can't quite remember. Anyone else ever see that? What was it?

any modern Hub from the XJ40 through the X300 and X308 will work. The hibs are the same on all those cars, but the calipers and rotors for the XJ40 are designed for solid rotors similar to the ones found inboard. The X300 and X308 rotors are vented for better cooling and need a bigger caliper.

As far as other parts, if it is an XJ40 you only need the stub axle as the XJ40 and older rears use the same u-joint. If you get an X300/308 stub axle you will need the entire half shaft as the u-joints are different. Other than that the only other difference is the diamiter of the hub to wishbone pin. As was mentioned already in this thread you either need to sleeve the wishbones and use the newer pin or use different bearings and the older pin. The difference in pin size is only .05" and the newer type pin rides in a sleeve that fits in the hub bearings so a person could probably have that sleeve machined out to accept the older stile pin. The other option and the one I will be doing is I am machining som UHMW bushings to replace the bearings. they will fit in to the newer hub and accept the larger stile pin. here are some pictures I took of some XJ6 parts compared to my X308 parts

Here is the modern hub with a bolt pattern adapter



Here is the hubs side by side





here is the half shafts, old and new



new hub on an old wishbone




I have researched this a lot, please let me know if I can help further
Reply With Quote
  #88 (permalink)  
Old 08-18-2010, 12:35 AM
CC Member
Visit my Photo Gallery

 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Cobra Make, Engine: Unique Motorcars 289 USRRC, 1964 289 stroked to 331, toploader
Posts: 1,088
Not Ranked     
Thumbs up

Thanks for the info Daze... the newer stub axle looks pretty whimpy! Is it up to high HP applications? Looks like they changed the splines on it... or am I missing something? I'll send a PM for more info. Thanks again.
Reply With Quote
  #89 (permalink)  
Old 08-18-2010, 06:56 AM
cobrarkc's Avatar
CC Member
Visit my Photo Gallery

 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Wayne, NJ
Cobra Make, Engine: Contemporary 482 all aluminum Tunnelport Self built and owned since 1980 frame#0000017 and owner of frame CCX 33961 looking for an FIA body to go with it
Posts: 428
Not Ranked     
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PDUB View Post
Thanks for the info Daze... the newer stub axle looks pretty whimpy! Is it up to high HP applications? Looks like they changed the splines on it... or am I missing something? I'll send a PM for more info. Thanks again.
You can still use the old stub axle by using a combiation u-joint. 1410 to 1350 and don't worry about the smaller 1350 u-joint they can handle up to 1000hp. This is where i got mine, even though they don't have it listed, ask them they have them.
http://www.dennysdriveshaft.com/c130...al_joints.html
Most u-joint places can get them for you.
__________________
Cobrarich
Reply With Quote
  #90 (permalink)  
Old 08-18-2010, 10:19 AM
CC Member
Visit my Photo Gallery

 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Cobra Make, Engine:
Posts: 10
Not Ranked     
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PDUB View Post
Thanks for the info Daze... the newer stub axle looks pretty whimpy! Is it up to high HP applications? Looks like they changed the splines on it... or am I missing something? I'll send a PM for more info. Thanks again.
If you look at the two stub axles, old and new, the splined sections are about the same diameter, and that is where the torque is transferred to the wheel flange. With that in mind the newer stub axles have more splines which should make them stronger than the older Jag stubs.... make sense??
__________________
If it aint broke..... modify it anyway!!!!
Mustang tech http://www.dazecars.com
IRS http://www.IRSuspension.com
Reply With Quote
  #91 (permalink)  
Old 08-21-2010, 01:21 AM
CC Member
Visit my Photo Gallery

 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Cobra Make, Engine: Unique Motorcars 289 USRRC, 1964 289 stroked to 331, toploader
Posts: 1,088
Not Ranked     
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dazecars View Post
If you look at the two stub axles, old and new, the splined sections are about the same diameter, and that is where the torque is transferred to the wheel flange. With that in mind the newer stub axles have more splines which should make them stronger than the older Jag stubs.... make sense??
The new splined section looks much sorter, and the splines look like they might strip out with any sort of wear, i.e. the surface area in which they mate to the hub looks whimpier. The old one looks like the input shaft on a toploader... that is pretty tough!

I'm not an ME, so I cannot say for sure, but it just looks weaker to me. I would love to hear from an expert, since I am interested in persuing the outboard brakes...

Cobrarkc, did you go with the outboard system?
Reply With Quote
  #92 (permalink)  
Old 08-21-2010, 09:30 AM
CC Member
Visit my Photo Gallery

 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Cobra Make, Engine:
Posts: 10
Not Ranked     
Default

I too am not a ME. I am sure the shorter splined section will reduce strength, but as fas as the splines them selves, lots of fine splines will always be way stronger than fewer heavy ones. its like a fine thread bolt vrs a course thread bolt, or a 19 spline axle vrs a 30 spline axle.
__________________
If it aint broke..... modify it anyway!!!!
Mustang tech http://www.dazecars.com
IRS http://www.IRSuspension.com
Reply With Quote
  #93 (permalink)  
Old 08-21-2010, 10:04 AM
Ralphy's Avatar
CC Member
Visit my Photo Gallery

 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Atlanta, GA
Cobra Make, Engine: 86 Everett Morrison 90" WB. 428 FE
Posts: 1,151
Not Ranked     
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dazecars View Post
I too am not a ME. I am sure the shorter splined section will reduce strength, but as fas as the splines them selves, lots of fine splines will always be way stronger than fewer heavy ones. its like a fine thread bolt vrs a course thread bolt, or a 19 spline axle vrs a 30 spline axle.
I did the math once years ago on a fine vs. course thread. Thinking the surface area was maybe close to the same in area. However because the surface or depth was less. The solid section of the bolt minus the thread is greater making the area stronger. Plus resists backing off better. A fine threaded bolt is better, unless it is in an area where the nut is continually taken on and off.

Last edited by Ralphy; 08-21-2010 at 10:06 AM..
Reply With Quote
  #94 (permalink)  
Old 08-22-2010, 01:55 AM
CC Member
Visit my Photo Gallery

 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Cobra Make, Engine: Unique Motorcars 289 USRRC, 1964 289 stroked to 331, toploader
Posts: 1,088
Not Ranked     
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ralphy View Post
A fine threaded bolt is better, unless it is in an area where the nut is continually taken on and off.
Is this due to wear? Does that mean the smaller spline would be more likely to wear faster with the fore and aft torque of the drive line?
Reply With Quote
  #95 (permalink)  
Old 08-22-2010, 05:30 PM
Ralphy's Avatar
CC Member
Visit my Photo Gallery

 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Atlanta, GA
Cobra Make, Engine: 86 Everett Morrison 90" WB. 428 FE
Posts: 1,151
Not Ranked     
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PDUB View Post
Is this due to wear? Does that mean the smaller spline would be more likely to wear faster with the fore and aft torque of the drive line?
PDUB, We use a lot of fixtures at work. What I have seen is a chance of pulling threads out with continual use, bolt in bolt out. A splined shaft has a large surface area vs. fasteners I would not think you would see wear on a shaft vs. a bolt. I would not worry.

Helicoils work even better!

Last edited by Ralphy; 08-22-2010 at 05:42 PM..
Reply With Quote
  #96 (permalink)  
Old 08-22-2010, 10:22 PM
Ralphy's Avatar
CC Member
Visit my Photo Gallery

 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Atlanta, GA
Cobra Make, Engine: 86 Everett Morrison 90" WB. 428 FE
Posts: 1,151
Not Ranked     
Default

Nick,

Looking at one of your pics, it seems this setup would be worthless without the watts? Those two horizontal links would be all over the place and sheer the bolts! Anyhow, would you think the lowers would work just as well with a tube and heim joints? Now one step further, could it work with one shock up front only?

What I do see in your photo is a setup that allows for the watts location to not be as critical as with a one piece lower, no?

http://www.clubcobra.com/photopost/s...0/ppuser/10964

Ralphy

Last edited by Ralphy; 08-23-2010 at 08:18 AM..
Reply With Quote
  #97 (permalink)  
Old 08-23-2010, 08:09 AM
cobrarkc's Avatar
CC Member
Visit my Photo Gallery

 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Wayne, NJ
Cobra Make, Engine: Contemporary 482 all aluminum Tunnelport Self built and owned since 1980 frame#0000017 and owner of frame CCX 33961 looking for an FIA body to go with it
Posts: 428
Not Ranked     
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PDUB View Post
The new splined section looks much sorter, and the splines look like they might strip out with any sort of wear, i.e. the surface area in which they mate to the hub looks whimpier. The old one looks like the input shaft on a toploader... that is pretty tough!

I'm not an ME, so I cannot say for sure, but it just looks weaker to me. I would love to hear from an expert, since I am interested in persuing the outboard brakes...

Cobrarkc, did you go with the outboard system?
I am not an ME either but here goes. Think about a Ford 9" rear axle there are either 28 spline or 31 spline with the later being stronger. Now think about how much of the axle is splined, around the same amount that is splined on the newer Jag axle stub. The part after the splined area the is necked down only holds the axle stub into the hub and doesn't need to be as thick.
__________________
Cobrarich
Reply With Quote
  #98 (permalink)  
Old 08-23-2010, 09:43 PM
mickmate's Avatar
Senior Club Cobra Member
Visit my Photo Gallery

 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Holderness, NH, US of A, NH
Cobra Make, Engine: CSX 4772 old iron FE
Posts: 5,499
Not Ranked     
Default

I'm a Mech and Prod Engineer but I didn't stay at a Holiday Inn last night. You guys have a good eye for what will and won't work and how to put it together, you're practical engineers. The key to comparing the parts you're looking at is CSA (cross sectional area) of the shaft that is acting in shear. If you have a lot more splines even if they aren't as deep if the CSA is greater on the part that is in shear it will obviously be a lot stronger. The watts is great in this application and I think very necessary. One of the high HP cars a customer of mine has is eating holes right through the rear inner fender with the flex and play of lower control arms allowing tires to touch it.
__________________
mickmate
http://www.actoncustom.com/
Reply With Quote
  #99 (permalink)  
Old 08-24-2010, 01:36 AM
CC Member
Visit my Photo Gallery

 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Cobra Make, Engine: Unique Motorcars 289 USRRC, 1964 289 stroked to 331, toploader
Posts: 1,088
Not Ranked     
Default

Daze, got any pics with the calipers in place? I'm curious about picking up the mounting points for a Watts link... top and side views.
Reply With Quote
  #100 (permalink)  
Old 08-24-2010, 01:40 AM
CC Member
Visit my Photo Gallery

 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Cobra Make, Engine: Unique Motorcars 289 USRRC, 1964 289 stroked to 331, toploader
Posts: 1,088
Not Ranked     
Default

Nick, are those caliper mounting points on the hub strong enough to hold a bracket for the Watts link? Not sure if there is room for one, but...
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:30 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0
The representations expressed are the representations and opinions of the clubcobra.com forum members and do not necessarily reflect the opinions and viewpoints of the site owners, moderators, Shelby American, any other replica manufacturer, Ford Motor Company. This website has been planned and developed by clubcobra.com and its forum members and should not be construed as being endorsed by Ford Motor Company, or Shelby American or any other manufacturer unless expressly noted by that entity. "Cobra" and the Cobra logo are registered trademarks for Ford Motor Co., Inc. clubcobra.com forum members agree not to post any copyrighted material unless the copyrighted material is owned by you. Although we do not and cannot review the messages posted and are not responsible for the content of any of these messages, we reserve the right to delete any message for any reason whatsoever. You remain solely responsible for the content of your messages, and you agree to indemnify and hold us harmless with respect to any claim based upon transmission of your message(s). Thank you for visiting clubcobra.com. For full policy documentation refer to the following link: CC Policy
Links monetized by VigLink