Main Menu
|
Nevada Classics
|
Advertise at CC
|
S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
23 |
24 |
25 |
26 |
27 |
28 |
29 |
30 |
|
CC Advertisers
|
|
03-11-2013, 04:36 PM
|
CC Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Bay Area (Peninsula),
CA
Cobra Make, Engine: ERA 427, 427/487 side-oiler
Posts: 1,248
|
|
Not Ranked
ERA optional rear suspension strength?
Does anyone know if the optional ERA rear suspension is stronger than the standard one (i.e., can handle more torque/HP)? If so, any idea how much stronger?
|
03-11-2013, 04:56 PM
|
|
CC Member/Contributor
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Greenville,
SC
Cobra Make, Engine: 70 Shelby convertible, ERA-289 FIA, 65 Sunbeam Tiger, mystery Ford powered 2dr convertible
Posts: 12,689
|
|
Not Ranked
Quote:
Originally Posted by lippy
Does anyone know if the optional ERA rear suspension is stronger than the standard one (i.e., can handle more torque/HP)? If so, any idea how much stronger?
|
yes stronger, I've put 400HP through the back of mine when I decided to play with a supercharger a few months ago
__________________
Instead of being part of the problem, be part of a successful solution.
First time Cobra buyers-READ THIS
|
03-11-2013, 05:40 PM
|
|
CC Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Burbs,
IL
Cobra Make, Engine: ERA #472, Previous owner of ERA #677 427, ERA 289 FIA-USRRC Street
Posts: 221
|
|
Not Ranked
Stronger...I have about 500hp and 500 lbs torque....you should be fine
__________________
"Some things get meaner as they get older."
|
03-11-2013, 05:58 PM
|
|
CC Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Clayton,
IN
Cobra Make, Engine: ERA 838
Posts: 1,122
|
|
Not Ranked
Hold on guys. How could it be stronger, both options use the same Jag 3rd member.
I have had both and the ERA option is very nice and very sexy.
John.
|
03-11-2013, 06:10 PM
|
|
Half-Ass Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Cobra Make, Engine: ERA #732, 428FE (447 CID), TKO600, Solid Flat Tappet Cam, Tons of Aluminum
Posts: 22,001
|
|
Not Ranked
I have the optional rear, and I'm pretty sure when I chatted with Doug in 2005, the answer was "No, it's not any stronger, just better."
|
03-11-2013, 07:59 PM
|
CC Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 4,078
|
|
Not Ranked
I know of a 580FWHP SB going through a Richmond that drag raced (on BB's). Frequently, will no ill effects.
__________________
Chas.
|
03-11-2013, 08:01 PM
|
CC Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Bay Area (Peninsula),
CA
Cobra Make, Engine: ERA 427, 427/487 side-oiler
Posts: 1,248
|
|
Not Ranked
Quote:
Originally Posted by ERA Chas
I know of a 580FWHP SB going through a Richmond that drag raced (on BB's). Frequently, will no ill effects.
|
With the ERA standard or optional rear suspension?
|
03-11-2013, 08:11 PM
|
|
Senior Club Cobra Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: West Linn,
OR
Cobra Make, Engine: ERA #684, 428 FE, TKO600
Posts: 1,378
|
|
Not Ranked
Not necessarily any stronger since it uses the same basic components but the geometry it provides makes things a lot cleaner. Most notable is that it keeps the rear carrier indexed under loads reducing/eliminating wheel hop.
One of the best features is the way it looks. Very sexy. Take a look at the photos of it on the ERA web site.
DonC
|
03-12-2013, 07:55 AM
|
CC Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 4,078
|
|
Not Ranked
Quote:
Originally Posted by lippy
With the ERA standard or optional rear suspension?
|
Optional. The 'standard' rear is the Jag. The 'optional' is ERA's. It's either a Jag or ERA's.
__________________
Chas.
|
03-12-2013, 04:13 PM
|
CC Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: E BRUNSWICK N.J. USA,
Posts: 3,841
|
|
Not Ranked
Over built the car
|
03-12-2013, 05:30 PM
|
|
Half-Ass Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Cobra Make, Engine: ERA #732, 428FE (447 CID), TKO600, Solid Flat Tappet Cam, Tons of Aluminum
Posts: 22,001
|
|
Not Ranked
Rick, nice to see you back... and I agree, these cars can be very dangerous and, for a lot of us, less is indeed more.
|
03-12-2013, 07:01 PM
|
CC Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Bay Area (Peninsula),
CA
Cobra Make, Engine: ERA 427, 427/487 side-oiler
Posts: 1,248
|
|
Not Ranked
Quote:
Originally Posted by RICK LAKE
|
Planning on using the "standard" but strengthened ERA/Salisbury rear with inboard brakes, Classic Chambered sidepipes, and Avons. I won't drag race or abuse the car, but I would like the extra roll-on power at mid-range RPMs. Peter and Bob at ERA tell me the 31 spline upgrade costs almost $2k and probably won't make that much of a difference, and that I could blow up even that with hyper aggressive driving. On the flip side, they seem to think the "standard" rear end is likely to be ok - even with the extra HP of a solid roller motor - if I don't abuse. I guess if I break it, I break it, and shouldn't sweat it too much.
|
03-12-2013, 07:35 PM
|
CC Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 4,078
|
|
Not Ranked
For the record-the 31 spline does make a difference. But heat-treated ring and pinion, side gears and L-19 bolts are vital for total abuse. That makes a difference for drag racing and snap shifts.
As Rick said, if you control the usage, it will live just fine without that.
As Brent says, that's why there's a throttle control.
BTW-a 'solid roller motor' is not 10 megaton bomb in the configuration you're planning.
Glad to see that you have adopted more pragmatic approach-now you're getting it.
__________________
Chas.
|
03-12-2013, 07:58 PM
|
CC Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Bay Area (Peninsula),
CA
Cobra Make, Engine: ERA 427, 427/487 side-oiler
Posts: 1,248
|
|
Not Ranked
Decided on the solid roller motor, btw.
|
03-12-2013, 08:00 PM
|
|
Half-Ass Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Cobra Make, Engine: ERA #732, 428FE (447 CID), TKO600, Solid Flat Tappet Cam, Tons of Aluminum
Posts: 22,001
|
|
Not Ranked
Quote:
Originally Posted by lippy
Decided on the solid roller motor, btw.
|
When do you think you'll have the car on the road?
|
03-12-2013, 09:06 PM
|
CC Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Bay Area (Peninsula),
CA
Cobra Make, Engine: ERA 427, 427/487 side-oiler
Posts: 1,248
|
|
Not Ranked
Quote:
Originally Posted by patrickt
When do you think you'll have the car on the road?
|
I get the kit end of April, painted, and the engine in May, +/-. From then I'm figuring on a year to build it, but if it takes longer, no problem. So that would probably be summer 2014.
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:11 AM.
Links monetized by VigLink
|