Main Menu
|
Nevada Classics
|
Advertise at CC
|
S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
23 |
24 |
25 |
26 |
27 |
28 |
29 |
30 |
|
CC Advertisers
|
|
01-30-2008, 10:24 AM
|
CC Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: E BRUNSWICK N.J. USA,
Posts: 3,841
|
|
Not Ranked
Aluminium Frame for the SC cobras?
|
01-30-2008, 10:30 AM
|
CC Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 4,078
|
|
Not Ranked
Rick,
Would not a carbon body vs glass accomplish similar weight savings with less hassle and no structural/manufacturing questions??
I don't know, I'm just brain farting too...
__________________
Chas.
|
01-30-2008, 10:35 AM
|
|
CC Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Northern VA,
VA
Cobra Make, Engine: Classic Roadsters
Posts: 2,765
|
|
Not Ranked
The new Corvettes have hydroformed aluminum frames
.
__________________
LIFE IS TOO SHORT TO WORRY ABOUT GOOD GAS MILEAGE
________
Utinam logica falsa tuam philosophiam totam suffodiant!
________
|
01-30-2008, 10:49 AM
|
|
CC Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2001
Location: California,
Ca
Cobra Make, Engine: NAF 289 Slabside Early Comp Car with 289 Webers and all the goodies. Cancelling the efforts of several Priuses
Posts: 6,592
|
|
Not Ranked
What real life benefits do you anticipate with street driven vehicle by saving 100 lbs??
This makes for good conversation but rel life benifits are nil.
__________________
Rick
As you slide down the Banister of Life, may the splinters never be pointing the wrong way
|
01-30-2008, 11:06 AM
|
CC Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2008
Cobra Make, Engine:
Posts: 773
|
|
Not Ranked
Just to throw my two cents in. Any weight reduction has a very noticable effect on not only track performance but also on street manners. If you haven't driven a 1900lb sport car you should try it! That being said the keys to optimum performance is a chassis that is torsionally stiff, suspension that maintains constant and optimum tire contact, has a low roll center, has zero scrub radius and zero bump steer through normal travel, center of gravity, has 50/50 weight, and with no significant weight infront or behind the axle center line! If you go through the expense of building an aluminum chassis you want to make sure that you address everything else too.
As I see it Cobra owners fall into a few different classes. There are the guys that only care that the car looks like a Cobra, those that want an authentic reproduction, and those that want the optimum performing super car with the heart pounding Cobra shape. I personally want the latter. I have always loved the Cobra and appreciate it's history buy want the ultimate in performance with out spending huge dollars to get it.
|
01-30-2008, 11:40 AM
|
CC Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: New Britain,
CT
Cobra Make, Engine: Size 10 Feet
Posts: 3,011
|
|
Not Ranked
I regard chassis stiffness more important than any (very) small weight savings. There are many better ways to save weight.
Aluminum Chassis
|
01-30-2008, 12:22 PM
|
CC Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Sudbury,
MA
Cobra Make, Engine: Diecast for now
Posts: 153
|
|
Not Ranked
Instead of Alum. how about Titanium ? Stronger and lighter.
|
01-30-2008, 01:01 PM
|
|
Abnormal CC Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Pottstown (East Coventry),
PA
Cobra Make, Engine: Don't think I'll be getting a Cobra for a long time... Do have '94 RX-7 R2.
Posts: 2,330
|
|
Not Ranked
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roger Cormier
Instead of Alum. how about Titanium ? Stronger and lighter.
|
How about uranium? Heavier, extremely expensive and radioactive.
|
01-30-2008, 01:16 PM
|
|
CC Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Northern VA,
VA
Cobra Make, Engine: Classic Roadsters
Posts: 2,765
|
|
Not Ranked
One of the things that made the real Cobras so bad-ass back in the old days is that they only weighed 1,900 lbs. Most of our replicas now weigh around 2,300 - 2,400 lbs. That is a 400 - 500 lb difference, or about 25% !!!! That is huge.
Think about how fast our cars are now, and then imagine if you took 500 lbs out of it !!!
.
__________________
LIFE IS TOO SHORT TO WORRY ABOUT GOOD GAS MILEAGE
________
Utinam logica falsa tuam philosophiam totam suffodiant!
________
Last edited by CobraEd; 01-30-2008 at 01:21 PM..
|
01-30-2008, 02:06 PM
|
|
CC Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Hudson,,
FL
Cobra Make, Engine: None at moment
Posts: 147
|
|
Not Ranked
Lets see....aluminum frame, aluminum FE stroker, and a carbon body!! Jim
|
01-30-2008, 02:09 PM
|
|
Abnormal CC Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Pottstown (East Coventry),
PA
Cobra Make, Engine: Don't think I'll be getting a Cobra for a long time... Do have '94 RX-7 R2.
Posts: 2,330
|
|
Not Ranked
Quote:
Originally Posted by CobraEd
One of the things that made the real Cobras so bad-ass back in the old days is that they only weighed 1,900 lbs. Most of our replicas now weigh around 2,300 - 2,400 lbs. That is a 400 - 500 lb difference, or about 25% !!!! That is huge.
Think about how fast our cars are now, and then imagine if you took 500 lbs out of it !!!
.
|
I think the only Cobra that was in the 1900 lb weight range was the flip-top, yet I hear people throwing around that number a bit. I believe that the Kirkham cars with their high tech light weight billet suspension parts fitted with an modern aluminum small block engine is still over 1900 lbs.
Perhaps the 1900 lb number is just more Shelby snake oil legend.
Actually I think most replicas are in the 2500 to 3000 lb range.
|
01-30-2008, 03:07 PM
|
|
CC Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: South Florida,
Posts: 122
|
|
Not Ranked
As far as original Cobras and their weights here is what I show:
427 Cobra unladen 2350 lbs.
289 Cobra unladen 2170 lbs.
Autokraft/AC Cobra unladen 2469 lbs.
I'm not too sure about any original Cobras weighing much less than that.
Sam
|
01-30-2008, 03:14 PM
|
|
Abnormal CC Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Pottstown (East Coventry),
PA
Cobra Make, Engine: Don't think I'll be getting a Cobra for a long time... Do have '94 RX-7 R2.
Posts: 2,330
|
|
Not Ranked
Quote:
Originally Posted by SLHetal
As far as original Cobras and their weights here is what I show:
427 Cobra unladen 2350 lbs.
289 Cobra unladen 2170 lbs.
Autokraft/AC Cobra unladen 2469 lbs.
I'm not too sure about any original Cobras weighing much less than that.
Sam
|
What is your source for those number? And what does unladen mean?
|
01-30-2008, 03:50 PM
|
CC Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2001
Cobra Make, Engine:
Posts: 678
|
|
Not Ranked
I think the original 427's were very not very heavy
__________________
Dan
427 CSX 3000/4000 and Shelbys.
All gone ! Was a Hell of a run
Now ... The dogs car
Mercedes E63S station wagon. 603hp
|
01-30-2008, 04:16 PM
|
CC Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Darnestown,
MD
Cobra Make, Engine: ERA 289FIA, 289 stroked to 331, 392 HP
Posts: 478
|
|
Not Ranked
In addition to its benefits, titanium is more brittle than either steel or aluminum and you'd have to spend more on the frame than most spend on the entire car.
|
01-30-2008, 04:23 PM
|
|
Abnormal CC Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Pottstown (East Coventry),
PA
Cobra Make, Engine: Don't think I'll be getting a Cobra for a long time... Do have '94 RX-7 R2.
Posts: 2,330
|
|
Not Ranked
Well what about good old magnesium? It caused quite a disaster for Mercedes at LeMans.
|
01-30-2008, 04:28 PM
|
|
CC Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Palm Coast,
FL
Cobra Make, Engine: Shelby American CSX 4241 - authentically built
Posts: 2,573
|
|
Not Ranked
Original S/Cs were about 2600 lbs. Remember, iron heads, iron block, boat anchor toploaders, iron rear case.
The Kirkhams were able to build a 2200 lb S/C with an alloy motor, alloy trans, alloy rear housing.
Any Cobra lighter than that, would be FAR from an original type car.
__________________
Sal Mennella
CSX 4241, KMP 357 - sold and missed, CSX 4819 - cancelled, FFR 5132 - sold
See my car at CSXinfo.net here >> CSX 4241
|
01-30-2008, 05:56 PM
|
|
CC Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Millbrook,
NY
Cobra Make, Engine: ERA 758 KC Pond 482
Posts: 391
|
|
Not Ranked
I've been trying to do a weight concious build, and am trying to get to 2300 lbs dry weight. Lots of little things like a 14 lb flywheel, a 15 lb battery, lightweight oil lines, etc. plus the obvious ones- all aluminum FE, G-force T-5 instead of the toploader or TKO, Quicktime bellhousing, light weight starter etc. all add up to a significant savings. The next one I'm thinking about is magnesium wheels. About a 70-80 lb total weight savings and its unsprung weight to boot.
From the get go, I was trying to get to a power to weight ratio similar to the Indy lights cars I drove (1400 lb/450hp). Its not really possible, but I won't be that far off (2300lb/600hp). Those cars were so quick, particularly when set up in street racing (Long Beach, Toronto, Vancouver, Detroit) mode. They were all carbon fiber except the few suspension bits and the drivetrain. Light weight is a greater benefit than just putting in more and more HP. The cars turn, stop and of course, go better and are more fun to drive.
|
01-30-2008, 06:40 PM
|
CC Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: New Britain,
CT
Cobra Make, Engine: Size 10 Feet
Posts: 3,011
|
|
Not Ranked
Weird as it may seem, most structural metals have a similar specific stiffness (stiffness/unit weight). There is no advantage to using one over the other except for gaining strength.
Titanium Fallacy
|
01-30-2008, 08:15 PM
|
CC Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2007
Cobra Make, Engine:
Posts: 327
|
|
Not Ranked
As FAR AS THE ORIGINAL COBRAS BEING , SO CALLED HOT, THEY WERE HOT AS OF WORTH ALOT OF MONEY TODAY, IF YOU WERE TO DRIVE AN ALL ORIGINAL YOU WOULD HATE IT, AND I SAID DRIVE IT, NOT OWN IT. THE COBRAS OF TODAY ARE MUCH MORE HIGH TECH, ADVANCED THAN THE CARS BACK IN THE DAY.
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:39 AM.
Links monetized by VigLink
|