 
Main Menu
|
|
Nevada Classics
|
|
Advertise at CC
|
|
April 2025
|
| S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
| |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
| 6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
| 13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
| 20 |
21 |
22 |
23 |
24 |
25 |
26 |
| 27 |
28 |
29 |
30 |
|
|
|
|
|
CC Advertisers
|
|
05-23-2006, 05:04 AM
|
 |
CC Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Glenwood Landing or Southampton,
NY
Cobra Make & Engine: Superformance, FRP460 Big Block
Posts: 975
|
|
>>The GT looks like it's more technical so that is a concern. Also there seems to be quite a bit more "after initial purchase" expenses to the GT. Or at least the parts seem to be much more costly.<<
Which is another reason why the "turnkey minus" concept works better for a lot of people. Essentially, the GT40 (CAV GT) is like a Formula car with a full body. It employs racing brakes, a racing clutch, and a suspension system that allows for virtually any tuning and adjustments you'd ever need. My CAV, with a crate 302 and the Audi Getrag transaxle, is worry-free and relatively inexpensive so far. It is an absolute dream to drive; once the car is dialed in, you won't believe what it can do in the twisties, even with street tyres. 
__________________
Ray
New York
SPF#1052 11mpg
CAV GT40 MONO29 9mpg
'94 35th Anniversary Rover Mini Cooper 32mpg
'01 MB CL600 V12 18mpg
'08 Volvo S80 18mpg
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:27 PM.
|
Hybrid Mode