|
Committee rejects online posting of health care bill
The Senate reject the idea of posting the health care bill online for at least 72 hours before voting on it.
WHY? Because Baccus says, "It would take 2 or 3 WEEKS to post it online!" Is this true? Are they totally out of step with modern devices? Is this the same Guv. that is overpaying a company to simply IMPROVE the money tracking website? Paying $5 million for work that should be well less than 1/10th of that number. Couldn't they ask that company to post the health care bill online for an xtra couple of mill? And if it did take 2 or 3 weeks [and EVERYONE knows that is BS] SO WHAT? 2013 is the planned implementation target. Taking 3 weeks and 3 days to have an intelligent vote seems LOGICAL. Latest poll says 83% of the PUBLIC would like the 72 hour online posting and only 17% say no. 0% that don't know. |
I thought one law makers comment on this issue was enlightening. So what if they post it 72 hours in advance? He wouldn't have enough time to call in a team of lawyers to help him read and understand it anyway. :)
Makes a lot of sense, with thousands of pages of "legalise" 72 hours isn't a drop in the bucket to get a handle on what your voting for. |
Baccus lies. Although it's a huge number of pages, there is no doubt that it's also in automated form, on a server or PC. With T-1 line, it could be loaded in under 3 minutes to the internet. It's something I could easily do, something that any of us can easily do.
|
If they really think it is such a problem to publish it due to size/complexity, it underscores why the Administration and Congress need to step back and take the time necessary to fully analyze what is being proposed instead of just passing something as fast as possible.
|
Baucus is a Senator
Bacc(h)us was a Roman God |
Who cares?
|
Smart people.
|
Quote:
Steve |
hehehe Now that's funny
|
What difference would it make, all the republicans will vote no, so why would it matter to them, it's just a stalling tactic, and this is just one bill out of one committee, when it gets to a final bill, it might be appropriate, for now though we know what the party of NO! will do.
|
Is that the blooter point of view? Thanks for sharing.
|
Might be appropriate???????
They don't want it posted online prior to voting because it would make it necessary for THEM to read it also. They're too important to waste that time, they need to raise $$$$ for their reelection campaigns. |
For all those that believe that spelling the liar's name is more important than the lies he tells,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,pity.
|
Quote:
|
Are you being a pecksniffian pettifogger today? I'm just sayin'.....
|
Quote:
blooter Plural blooters blooter (plural blooters) A babbler, a bumbling idiot, a fool. 1627 A bluiter buskit lyk a belly blind. — Alexander Montgomerie, Poems 1907 ‘Oh, to the devil wi' ye!’ said Wanton Wully, sweating with vexation. ‘Of all the senseless bells! A big, boss bluiter! I canna compel nor coax ye!’ — Neil Munro, Daft Days 1999 Women go into pubs... to enjoy a quiet drink with friends. And any halitosis-ridden, hand-wandering blooter who thinks otherwise could find himself stuck up his own optic. — Glasgow Daily Record, July 13 A hard kick of a ball. Oftentimes the kick is wild as well. Also, a ball kicked in such a way. 2002 He of the fabulous long-range shot or the useless blooter professes to love everything about Rangers. — Daily Mail, December 23. |
[quote=cobra de capell;988500]Is that the blooter point of view? Thanks for sharing.[/QUOTE
Your such a rube |
This one has deteriorated to Romper Room-level. ,,,,,,,pity. :LOL:
|
| All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:31 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0
The representations expressed are the representations and opinions of the clubcobra.com forum members and do not necessarily reflect the opinions and viewpoints of the site owners, moderators, Shelby American, any other replica manufacturer, Ford Motor Company. This website has been planned and developed by clubcobra.com and its forum members and should not be construed as being endorsed by Ford Motor Company, or Shelby American or any other manufacturer unless expressly noted by that entity. "Cobra" and the Cobra logo are registered trademarks for Ford Motor Co., Inc. clubcobra.com forum members agree not to post any copyrighted material unless the copyrighted material is owned by you. Although we do not and cannot review the messages posted and are not responsible for the content of any of these messages, we reserve the right to delete any message for any reason whatsoever. You remain solely responsible for the content of your messages, and you agree to indemnify and hold us harmless with respect to any claim based upon transmission of your message(s). Thank you for visiting clubcobra.com. For full policy documentation refer to the following link: