 
Main Menu
|
Nevada Classics
|
Advertise at CC
|
S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
23 |
24 |
25 |
26 |
27 |
28 |
29 |
30 |
|
|
|
|
CC Advertisers
|
|

02-24-2005, 09:29 AM
|
Banned
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2003
Cobra Make, Engine:
Posts: 1,085
|
|
Not Ranked
Shelby CSX4000 Aluminum vs. Kirkham
Without insulting anyone what are the advatanges of a Shelby vs a Kirkham and vice versa? (both in aluminum) I know they are both outstanding cars.
I'm strictly speaking about mechanically, fit and finish, closeness to orginal, etc.
This is what I have so far:
Points to Shelby:
It's a Shelby car that comes with a CSX s/n
Comes painted
Points for Kirkham:
Lighter weight by a couple hundred pounds
Drawbacks for Shelby:
Heavier
Drawbacks for Kirkham:
No paint (if you want a painted car as I do)
What am I missing?
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:36 PM.
Links monetized by VigLink
|