data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7a71f/7a71fe46d1b1e74e70ff56f6b35e83130d797bb0" alt="Old"
05-29-2002, 12:47 AM
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dfc4b/dfc4b554cc2f1e378d0e21bc9f045307141f9522" alt="Mr.Fixit's Avatar" |
CC Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: so cal,
Cal
Cobra Make, Engine: I used to fix them for a living
Posts: 2,563
|
|
Not Ranked
I think that the puller type slave cylinders are more prone to leaking because the rod is attached to the piston directly, without a pivot at the piston / rod interface. Pusher slaves allow the pushrod to pivot at the contact point at the piston, so the piston does not get sideloaded so heavily I never installed puller slaves by choice, they're more expensive and seem to not be as long lasting. A homemade bracket cut out of 1/4" thick mild steel 90 degree angle iron can be bolted to the tranny / bellhousing bolts on the driver's side and attach any pusher slave you like. Make the pushrod out of a 7/16" bolt that you cut to length and round both ends on. Go to NAPA and have the parts guy get out the book, pick a slave with the proper diam. and length for your master cyl and fork throw-distance requirements. This is the setup I preferred, tried a few different slaves over the years, depending on master cyl being used at the time.
__________________
In a fit of 16 year old genius, I looked down through the carb while cranking it to see if fuel was flowing, and it was. Flowing straight up in a vapor cloud, around my head, on fire.
|