 
Main Menu
|
|
Nevada Classics
|
|
Advertise at CC
|
| S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
| |
|
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
| 5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
| 12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
| 19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
23 |
24 |
25 |
| 26 |
27 |
28 |
29 |
30 |
31 |
|
|
|
CC Advertisers
|
|
 3Likes
08-11-2015, 11:53 AM
|
|
CC Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 136
|
|
Not Ranked
Advice on 331 sbf
looking for advice on a 331 build , nice hyd roller cam will be a 4bbl carb build. Thinking on a alum block maybe ,like the 100lb weight loss . What is the best direction to take.
|
08-11-2015, 12:09 PM
|
 |
CC Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: White City,
SK
Cobra Make, Engine: West Coast, 460 CID
Posts: 2,914
|
|
Not Ranked
This is an interesting read if you haven't already seen it. Small Block Ford Reality
Disclosure: I'm not endorsing these guys as engine builders, I'm only posting this as I found it an interesting perspective.
__________________
Brian
|
08-11-2015, 12:14 PM
|
|
CC Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Louisville,
KY
Cobra Make, Engine: I'm Cobra-less!
Posts: 9,417
|
|
Not Ranked
I do them both on a regular basis, in both cast iron and aluminum.
The Dart aluminum blocks are so light that I can pick one up off the floor with one finger...
Here's one that I did where I showed the build process:
B2 Motorsports - Cliff Rosson All-Aluminum 331 SBF Build
There's a lot of tricks to the all-aluminum builds and a lot of stuff you have to watch out for... |
08-11-2015, 12:39 PM
|
|
CC Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 136
|
|
Not Ranked
ok guys how does the shelby sbf alum block stand.. are these date coded like a hi po block. not looking for a ton of power just 400hp and be real nice low down for cruising.
|
08-11-2015, 12:44 PM
|
|
CC Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Louisville,
KY
Cobra Make, Engine: I'm Cobra-less!
Posts: 9,417
|
|
Not Ranked
Well, here's the thing....
You pay a butt load for the Shelby name. Ridiculously expensive.
Also, yes, they may be date coded, but they're also aluminum, which would negate the date code being accurate. 
I've got 5 bolt 289 cores here if you're looking for something period correct. They can be stroked to 331/347 no problem. |
08-11-2015, 12:54 PM
|
|
CC Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 136
|
|
Not Ranked
Thanks Brett. Really looking at alum block .. Not so much period correctness , maybe Dart/MOW alum block.
Yeah i followed Cliff engine build will be a real screamer when he gets his project all done.
|
08-11-2015, 12:58 PM
|
|
CC Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Louisville,
KY
Cobra Make, Engine: I'm Cobra-less!
Posts: 9,417
|
|
Not Ranked
If you're wanting low end torque, go for the 347....no real reason to skip out on free cubic inches and power. All that you've heard about long stroke engines not revving or 347's using oil are internet wives tales, perpetuated by people who don't know...
The aluminum block will not be noticeable in the car unless you're racing scales and you'll save about $4500 on the build. Aluminum block builds are noticeably higher on the build difficulty scale as you have to account for the block's expansion in bearing clearances, valve lash/preload, and deck height. |
08-11-2015, 01:14 PM
|
|
CC Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 136
|
|
Not Ranked
347 Brett nice number , i personally have no issue with the old wives tales.
|
08-11-2015, 01:34 PM
|
|
CC Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Louisville,
KY
Cobra Make, Engine: I'm Cobra-less!
Posts: 9,417
|
|
Not Ranked
Last "mild" 347 I did, I used aluminum RHS heads, hydraulic roller, and a pretty low-performance dual plane intake because the guy needed as much hood clearance as possible. It still made 425 hp @ 5700 and 445 lb-ft @ 4500.
|
08-11-2015, 01:37 PM
|
|
CC Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Louisville,
KY
Cobra Make, Engine: I'm Cobra-less!
Posts: 9,417
|
|
Not Ranked
|
08-11-2015, 04:50 PM
|
|
CC Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: White City,
SK
Cobra Make, Engine: West Coast, 460 CID
Posts: 2,914
|
|
Not Ranked
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brooklyn-427
347 Brett nice number , i personally have no issue with the old wives tales.
|
BTW, it's Brent Lykins, not Brett.
__________________
Brian
|
08-11-2015, 05:15 PM
|
|
CC Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Louisville,
KY
Cobra Make, Engine: I'm Cobra-less!
Posts: 9,417
|
|
Not Ranked
I've been called worse..... |
08-11-2015, 09:17 PM
|
|
CC Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: White City,
SK
Cobra Make, Engine: West Coast, 460 CID
Posts: 2,914
|
|
Not Ranked
Quote:
Originally Posted by blykins
I've been called worse..... |
Yeah, I think most of us have at one time or another...
__________________
Brian
|
08-12-2015, 01:50 AM
|
|
CC Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 136
|
|
Not Ranked
Sorry Brent thats my bad and to say i read enough of the posts with your name titled in them.
|
08-12-2015, 09:16 AM
|
 |
CC Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Portland,
OR
Cobra Make, Engine: ERA FIA, 1964 289->Webers
Posts: 3,689
|
|
Not Ranked
is it about HP or weight? 400-450hp is a pretty fast gokart. Light weight is nice but, the car is going to feel pretty lively, even with a non roller cam & a 100 less HP.
__________________
ERA FIA 2088
|
08-12-2015, 09:45 AM
|
 |
CC Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Colorado Springs,
CO
Cobra Make, Engine: Backdraft, supercharged Coyote
Posts: 2,452
|
|
Not Ranked
Light weight is nice. But, balance is better (IMO). The Roadster is already biased towards the rear (slightly). My car is 51% rear, 49% front with half a tank of fuel and an empty trunk. With 75-100# removed from the front, the weight will be even more biased to the rear.
Might consider moving the engine forward an inch or so.
__________________
.boB "Iron Man"
NASA Rocky Mountain TTU #42
www.RacingtheExocet.com
BDR #1642 - Supercharged Coyote, 6 speed Auto
|
08-12-2015, 09:50 AM
|
|
CC Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 136
|
|
Not Ranked
Yeah balance works better with these cars so maybe the alum block could be slight over kill... Bragging rights apply i guess.
|
08-12-2015, 11:41 AM
|
|
CC Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Crystal Lake,
IL
Cobra Make, Engine: Everett-Morrison, 434 cid
Posts: 977
|
|
Not Ranked
My car runs the best lap times with 55-57% rear.
|
08-12-2015, 03:05 PM
|
 |
CC Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Melbourne,
Vic
Cobra Make, Engine: Some polish thing... With some old engine
Posts: 2,286
|
|
Not Ranked
Quote:
Originally Posted by scottj
My car runs the best lap times with 55-57% rear.
|
Porsche (911) I discovered are also read weight biased.
They don't seem to do too badly in the handling stakes.
More weight to the rear allows for better traction to the rear wheels.
Soothing that is limited in a cobra. |
08-12-2015, 04:59 PM
|
|
CC Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2006
Location: St. Louisville,
Oh
Cobra Make, Engine: A&C 67 427 cobra SB
Posts: 2,445
|
|
Not Ranked
If you were to purchase an aftermarket cast iron block in the 4.125" bore, you would have 364 cid. Obviously you would have a much stronger block with better oiling design, and that is worth something. The 17 cubes aught to be worth at least 20 Hp (figure un-shrouding the valves should help too).
So is the 20+ Hp and better block worth the $2500-3000 for the block?
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:04 PM.
Links monetized by VigLink
|
Linear Mode
