Main Menu
|
Nevada Classics
|
Advertise at CC
|
S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
23 |
24 |
25 |
26 |
27 |
28 |
29 |
30 |
|
CC Advertisers
|
|
02-12-2009, 07:09 PM
|
CC Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Houston,
TX
Cobra Make, Engine: Superformance #1374 with 392 RDI Stroker
Posts: 502
|
|
Not Ranked
Small Block Question
I am thinking about building a 289 slabside as close to the original specs as I can. I currently run a SPF and have always liked the smaller version. I lived in the UK for almost 20 years and really liked the HAWK version, but did not like the MGB components.
I am looking for information on engine size. Should I run a 302 based engine (stroked or not) or move up to the 351 W (stroked or not) I want to run a TKO 600 behind what ever I choose.
Now to the question. A buddy of mine says FASTCO makes good motors and bang for the buck is pretty good. I know I can go with Ford Racing, Roush, RDI, KC and countless others. What are your feeling on FASTCO engines? Any experience?
Any help will be appreciated
Goober
|
02-12-2009, 07:41 PM
|
|
CC Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Colorado Springs,
CO
Cobra Make, Engine: Backdraft, supercharged Coyote
Posts: 2,444
|
|
Not Ranked
If you want it as close to original specs as possible, the 351W is out.
I would use a 331 or 347. It will look the same as the original 289, but have more displacement and more power. More power is more better.
|
02-12-2009, 07:46 PM
|
|
CC Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Scotts Valley,
CA
Cobra Make, Engine: ERA 289 FIA #2108
Posts: 1,882
|
|
Not Ranked
If you don't like the MBG front suspension, take a look at ERA's 289 FIA. Still has the svelte body of the 289 slabside, but with the wide rear hips of the 427.
DD
__________________
Dangerous Doug
"You're kidding, right?"
|
02-12-2009, 08:22 PM
|
CC Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: PVE,
CA
Cobra Make, Engine: ERA 289 FIA #2027, 65' 289" PS wheels
Posts: 345
|
|
Not Ranked
agree with Doug..,
Goober,
I have an ERA 289 FIA. The slab side has always appealed to me, and back in 1997 the ERA FIA car was about as close as I could get with a good chassis...no regrets!
The engine is a 6-bolt 1965' 289" block that is stoked out to 347" so running a 351" would only make sense to me if you stroke it out over 390'+...otherwise save the weight and go with a small block, 289 or 302.
I am not sure that a 351" would be noticeable to anyone other than a Cobra fan...it is about +/- 0.8" taller, more or less, and I wanted to run a high-rise manifold with out a hood scoop...actually, there is lots of room to spare with the Weiand Stealth manifold, so I could have run a stoked 351"...but had another 70-90 lbs or so...I am assuming aluminum heads and iron block...
The car now has 13500 miles, no problems, on the road since 2003... some track time, about 10 events, and has never had a car related problem...if it wasn't for Holley, no problems...and those aren't that bad.
A well sorted out machine with endless support?..the only "slab-side" I am aware that is a car I would want is the Kirkham 289"...out of my price range, but I am happy were I am.
Have fun.
__________________
ERA 289 #2027
|
02-13-2009, 04:36 PM
|
CC Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Darnestown,
MD
Cobra Make, Engine: ERA 289FIA, 289 stroked to 331, 392 HP
Posts: 478
|
|
Not Ranked
If your only issue with the Hawk was the MGB suspension, you might want to check them out again. They have a new independent suspension set up that is supposedly not based on the MGB componenets anymore.
I also have the ERA 289FIA with a 1965 289 only stroked to 331. It has all the power and performance I need. I originally intended to use the 351 but switched to save the weight and for more originality. It also helped in the title and registration process that the engine was 40 years old.
BTW -- The "hips" on the FIA are not as wide as the 427 and are blended at the front (by the doors) better than the 427.
|
02-14-2009, 08:53 AM
|
|
Senior Club Cobra Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: McAllen,
TX
Cobra Make, Engine: Butler...488" hi-rise, dry-sump FE s/o w/stacks
Posts: 543
|
|
Not Ranked
If you need to find a replacement for the MGB front suspension....check out www.fastcarsinc.com. They replaced my MGB with the fastcars unit and it drives beautifully. I have some pics posted in my gallery.
__________________
Russ
|
02-14-2009, 12:07 PM
|
CC Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Houston,
TX
Cobra Make, Engine: Superformance #1374 with 392 RDI Stroker
Posts: 502
|
|
Not Ranked
Thanks for all the replies. Good suspension upgrades.
How about the original question about FASTCO engines?
Any takers?
Mark
|
02-15-2009, 11:36 PM
|
|
CC Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Temuka,
NZ
Cobra Make, Engine: Scratch build, with help
Posts: 116
|
|
Not Ranked
Quote:
Originally Posted by Goober
How about the original question about FASTCO engines?
Any takers?
Mark
|
have a read here - remembering there are two sides to every story
http://www.cobraclub.com/forum/snake...tml#post286600
__________________
Maurice
researching for scratch build
|
02-16-2009, 09:41 AM
|
CC Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Houston,
TX
Cobra Make, Engine: Superformance #1374 with 392 RDI Stroker
Posts: 502
|
|
Not Ranked
Thanks Mate, boy was that some reading. Not really sure who's right or wrong. Probalby several sides to this story. Guess for the main part I'll stay away from Fastco.
Thanks for all the replies
Mark
|
02-16-2009, 10:40 AM
|
CC Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2009
Cobra Make, Engine:
Posts: 2
|
|
Not Ranked
Quote:
Originally Posted by Goober
Thanks Mate, boy was that some reading. Not really sure who's right or wrong. Probalby several sides to this story. Guess for the main part I'll stay away from Fastco.
Thanks for all the replies
Mark
|
hi mark..... if i was you i would stay WELL CLEAR of fastco
i am the person (among many others)on the above site who have been well and truely ripped off!! there are NO 2 sides to this story.. the evidence is in black and white!! if you need any questions answered, i will be happy to help!
good luck
tony
|
02-16-2009, 11:47 AM
|
CC Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Lewes,
ES
Cobra Make, Engine: AK, 351C T5WC
Posts: 1
|
|
Not Ranked
More here http://snaketorque.co.uk/index.php?topic=3075.0 The guy can't remember if he supplied an Internal or External balanced crank
|
02-16-2009, 07:41 PM
|
|
CC Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Las Vegas,
NV
Cobra Make, Engine: Shelby CSX4005LA, Roush 427IR
Posts: 5,573
|
|
Not Ranked
So, "numbers". Mine is a Roush 427IR which started life as a 351 Dart block. Is this a small block or "mid block"? I always thought the small blocks were the 289s (<300. I thought the big blocks started with the 390s). Old memories from the 70's. Don't ask.
I don't care. It rocks.
|
02-17-2009, 12:37 AM
|
CC Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2008
Cobra Make, Engine:
Posts: 272
|
|
Not Ranked
Goober
The Hawk is available with a Jaguar rear end 2.88-3.77 ratios and a custom front end with custom brakes and suspension. Talk to Gerry Hawkridge he a very nice guy and can advise you well.
|
02-17-2009, 06:29 AM
|
CC Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Sudbury,
MA
Cobra Make, Engine: Diecast for now
Posts: 153
|
|
Not Ranked
Shelby also offers a Slabside as CSX8000
|
02-17-2009, 09:52 AM
|
|
CC Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Oceanside,
Ca
Cobra Make, Engine: ...
Posts: 201
|
|
Not Ranked
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pete Munroe
Goober,
I have an ERA 289 FIA. The slab side has always appealed to me, and back in 1997 the ERA FIA car was about as close as I could get with a good chassis...no regrets!
The engine is a 6-bolt 1965' 289" block that is stoked out to 347" so running a 351" would only make sense to me if you stroke it out over 390'+...otherwise save the weight and go with a small block, 289 or 302.
I am not sure that a 351" would be noticeable to anyone other than a Cobra fan...it is about +/- 0.8" taller, more or less, and I wanted to run a high-rise manifold with out a hood scoop...actually, there is lots of room to spare with the Weiand Stealth manifold, so I could have run a stoked 351"...but had another 70-90 lbs or so...I am assuming aluminum heads and iron block...
The car now has 13500 miles, no problems, on the road since 2003... some track time, about 10 events, and has never had a car related problem...if it wasn't for Holley, no problems...and those aren't that bad.
A well sorted out machine with endless support?..the only "slab-side" I am aware that is a car I would want is the Kirkham 289"...out of my price range, but I am happy were I am.
Have fun.
|
I have seen & heard Pete's car (but not driven ) in person and it is Spectacular. Check out his pics.
-Mark
__________________
- Just call me Speed
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:00 AM.
Links monetized by VigLink
|