Main Menu
|
Nevada Classics
|
Advertise at CC
|
S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
23 |
24 |
25 |
26 |
27 |
28 |
29 |
30 |
|
CC Advertisers
|
|
1Likes
-
1
Post By twobjshelbys
05-01-2014, 09:48 PM
|
|
CC Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Plano,
TX
Cobra Make, Engine: BDR, Coyote 5.0 (Sold to Justin in Burleson) working on #2
Posts: 106
|
|
Not Ranked
A few cobras up for auction tomorrow at Seabrook, TX
|
05-02-2014, 10:20 AM
|
|
CC Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Vero Beach,
FL
Cobra Make, Engine: COX 6111 - '66 "AC 289 Sports."
Posts: 1,572
|
|
Not Ranked
Uh, wait, I don't understand something. If it's a 4000-series, how can it be a "1965 Cobra?"
__________________
Ned Scudder
|
05-02-2014, 11:54 AM
|
|
CC Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Humble,
Tx
Cobra Make, Engine: Auto Restoration and Service
Posts: 189
|
|
Not Ranked
"Uh, wait, I don't understand something. If it's a 4000-series, how can it be a "1965 Cobra?"
In Texas, replicas are titled in the year they represent.
The red one looks VERY familiar (wink, wink).
__________________
Mitch
|
05-02-2014, 03:46 PM
|
Banned
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 589
|
|
Not Ranked
I still don't understand why they put those years on a title but glad that the one I looked at also had replica on it.
Hey be nice I was told I polluted the Chevy Cobra picture thread. I still don't see how the Cobra word is used for ones not from the '62-67 period. I thought Chevy roadster was a better name.
If a continuation owner puts a chevy engine in one wouldn't that hurt resale value?
|
05-02-2014, 04:13 PM
|
|
CC Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Haslet,
TX
Cobra Make, Engine: BDR #888, Keith Craft 408
Posts: 344
|
|
Not Ranked
Quote:
Originally Posted by OnyxRider
I still don't understand why they put those years on a title but glad that the one I looked at also had replica on it.
Hey be nice I was told I polluted the Chevy Cobra picture thread. I still don't see how the Cobra word is used for ones not from the '62-67 period. I thought Chevy roadster was a better name.
If a continuation owner puts a chevy engine in one wouldn't that hurt resale value?
|
You don't live in Texas, so you don't have to understand.
|
05-02-2014, 07:09 PM
|
Banned
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 589
|
|
Not Ranked
Quote:
Originally Posted by Grey 65
You don't live in Texas, so you don't have to understand.
|
Honestly have no idea what state does what on a cobra replica or others makes for that matter.
All I know when I do searches for what we know as an original Cobra it seems like most everything else shows up and the misleading year is my biggest complaint. That's my experience
|
05-02-2014, 10:23 PM
|
|
CC Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Vero Beach,
FL
Cobra Make, Engine: COX 6111 - '66 "AC 289 Sports."
Posts: 1,572
|
|
Not Ranked
That's funny; I have had the same experience. But I suspect we are the only two.
__________________
Ned Scudder
|
05-03-2014, 12:13 PM
|
|
CC Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Las Vegas,
NV
Cobra Make, Engine: Shelby CSX4005LA, Roush 427IR
Posts: 5,573
|
|
Not Ranked
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nedsel
Uh, wait, I don't understand something. If it's a 4000-series, how can it be a "1965 Cobra?"
|
Mine was titled that way too. And it was a CA title to boot (I have a copy if anyone would like to see it).
So why does every topic that doesn't even start off that way have to return to beating dogs and kicking dead horses? I guess it hasn't been brought up for a while so maybe it's time again. But nothing new will be added...
__________________
Cheers,
Tony
CSX4005LA
|
05-03-2014, 01:31 PM
|
CC Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,092
|
|
Not Ranked
Quote:
Originally Posted by twobjshelbys
Mine was titled that way too. And it was a CA title to boot (I have a copy if anyone would like to see it).
So why does every topic that doesn't even start off that way have to return to beating dogs and kicking dead horses? I guess it hasn't been brought up for a while so maybe it's time again. But nothing new will be added...
|
The CSX being sold explains why it was titled a 1965 if anyone would bother to read the description.
The Car… This all aluminum rocket was recreated by Shelby American in 2006, but titled as a proper 1965 as it was produced with many OEM period parts and certified Shelby craftsmanship. Not to be confused with a tribute, this car was produced by Shelby and has a CSX production vin number that represents its a genuine Shelby car.
|
05-03-2014, 03:24 PM
|
|
CC Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Las Vegas,
NV
Cobra Make, Engine: Shelby CSX4005LA, Roush 427IR
Posts: 5,573
|
|
Not Ranked
Quote:
Originally Posted by AL427SBF
The CSX being sold explains why it was titled a 1965 if anyone would bother to read the description.
The Car… This all aluminum rocket was recreated by Shelby American in 2006, but titled as a proper 1965 as it was produced with many OEM period parts and certified Shelby craftsmanship. Not to be confused with a tribute, this car was produced by Shelby and has a CSX production vin number that represents its a genuine Shelby car.
|
I understand that - but even a CSX isn't titled as a 65 in all states. CA no longer does, you get a new VIN even though the CSX VIN is recognized in some states. Mine somehow slipped under the radar screen in CA I think because it was a retitle from another country (Mexico). Not all states will title it that way any more. Some do. Texas and Colorado do.
I think that perhaps the oxymoron here is that the SPF is listed at the auction as a 2004 while the CSX is listed as a 65.
It is an interesting academic discussion. I wonder how states that title a Shelby CSX4000 car as a 65 handle a Factory 5 1933 Ford Roadster replica, or a Superformance Corvette Grand Sport? There, maybe I added something new. It is a question I've never seen asked in the framework of this discussion.
__________________
Cheers,
Tony
CSX4005LA
|
05-03-2014, 03:25 PM
|
Banned
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 589
|
|
Not Ranked
Quote:
Originally Posted by AL427SBF
The CSX being sold explains why it was titled a 1965 if anyone would bother to read the description.
The Car… This all aluminum rocket was recreated by Shelby American in 2006, but titled as a proper 1965 as it was produced with many OEM period parts and certified Shelby craftsmanship. Not to be confused with a tribute, this car was produced by Shelby and has a CSX production vin number that represents its a genuine Shelby car.
|
Good for them I could care less...as stated I waste a lot of time having to come across what is not what I am looking for. If I wanted a 1965 made in 1987 Cobra with OEM period parts I would put that in my search engine.
Why don't they just put all that intel in their title instead of 1965 Cobra.
I also have no issue with what is original/kit/continuation/pretender/copy/reproduction...just put it in the title...
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:07 AM.
Links monetized by VigLink
|